EXTIRPATED - Revision history

Cellsworth at 20:06, 25 November 2020

2020-11-25T20:06:58Z

Cellsworth at 22:24, 3 August 2018

2018-08-03T22:24:03Z

Cellsworth at 20:04, 9 July 2018

2018-07-09T20:04:17Z

Cellsworth at 17:48, 9 July 2018

2018-07-09T17:48:36Z

Cellsworth at 16:27, 9 July 2018

2018-07-09T16:27:51Z

Cellsworth at 17:59, 3 November 2017

2017-11-03T17:59:50Z

Cellsworth at 17:54, 3 November 2017

2017-11-03T17:54:05Z

Cellsworth at 17:42, 3 November 2017

2017-11-03T17:42:08Z

Cellsworth at 17:41, 3 November 2017

2017-11-03T17:41:09Z

Cellsworth at 17:40, 3 November 2017

2017-11-03T17:40:25Z

@@ Line 103: / Line 103: @@
 |style="color:#000;"|
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/11jun28/Attach_09b.pdf AMP Goal 3: Assessing Restoration Potential of Taxa of Management Concern in the Colorado River Ecosystem Downstream from Glen Canyon Dam PPT]
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/11mar08/Attach_07.pdf Goal 3, Extirpated Species Ad Hoc Group Report]

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 =='''Colorado River Otter'''==
 *[[Media:Colorado River Otter- LStevens.m4a|Audio]]
 *[[Colorado River Otter- EP| Script]]

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/10nov15/Attach_04.pdf Grand Canyon Wildlands Council White Paper: Extirpated Species in the Colorado River Ecosystem March 25, 2009. The Status, Ecological Role, and Potential for Reintroduction of Species Extirpated from the Colorado River Ecosystem, Glen and Grand Canyons, Arizona]
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09aug12/Attach_18.pdf Ecological Role, and Potential for Reintroduction of Species Extirpated from the Colorado River Ecosystem, Glen and Grand Canyons, Arizona; Draft Executive Summary dated March 15, 2009, by Grand Canyon Wildlands Council and corresponding PPT]
 |-

@@ Line 117: / Line 117: @@
 *The CFMP-EA does not propose management actions to reintroduce extirpated species to the project area; however, reintroduction feasibility studies conducted over the life of the plan would undergo subsequest NEPA analysis.  (NPS CFMP-EA_pg59)
 *[http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059982240 How close is close enough for gray wolf recovery? It's Interior's call]
 |}

@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/11mar08/Attach_07.pdf Goal 3, Extirpated Species Ad Hoc Group Report]
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/10nov15/Attach_04.pdf Grand Canyon Wildlands Council White Paper: Extirpated Species in the Colorado River Ecosystem March 25, 2009. The Status, Ecological Role, and Potential for Reintroduction of Species Extirpated from the Colorado River Ecosystem, Glen and Grand Canyons, Arizona]
 |-

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 *[http://www.gcmrc.gov/research_areas/extirpated_species/extirpated_species_default.aspx USGS Extirpated Species -GCMRC]
+*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Species_of_Management_Concern Species of Management Concern Page]
 |-
 ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Presentations and Papers</h2>

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 =='''Extirpated Species'''==
-At least 14, and perhaps more than 23, animal taxa that existed or regularly bred in the CRE have
+At least 14, to more than 23 animal species that existed or regularly bred in the
-been extirpated, with only two of those extirpations occurring prior to the closure of Glen Canyon
+CRE have been extirpated, with only two of those extirpations occurring prior to the closure of
-Dam in 1963. A total of 18 taxa (21 percent of the TMC list) are federally or state-protected or are
+Glen Canyon Dam in 1963 (California condor - Gymnogyps californianus, and gray wolf - Canis
-of specific importance to Tribes, either through the ESA, through separate federal legislation, or
+lupus youngi; Table 2; Appendix A). TMC known to have been extirpated include: 4 fish
-through state or Tribal recognition. Among these 18 taxa are at least 10 extant endangered species.
+(Colorado pikeminnow – Pychocheilus lucius, razorback sucker – Xyrauchen texanus, and
-Extirpated or at-risk species that are not federally listed make up the majority of the TMC in the
+bonytail and roundtail chub – Gila elegans and G. robusta, respectively), 2 amphibians
-CRE (including all of the above taxa). A total of 46 (53.5 percent) of all  plant and animal taxa of management concern (TMC) had restoration
+(Lithobates pipiens and L. nr. yavapaiensis), zebra-tailed lizard, 4 birds (breeding southwestern
-potential scores >50, suggesting that they may warrant management attention, including research,
+willow flycatcher – Empidonax trailii extimus; western yellow-billed cuckoo - Coccyzus
-monitoring, or restoration. [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/11aug24/Attach_05.pdf]
+americanus occidentalis, Gambel’s quail - Callipepla gambelii, and California condor, which was reintroduced outside the CRE in 1996); and 3 mammals (badger – Taxodea taxa; the likely
 ==[[Portal:Desired Future Conditions -DFCs| '''Desired Future Condition for Extirpated Species''']]==
@@ Line 69: / Line 73: @@
 =='''[[Southwestern Willow Flycatcher-ES| Southwestern Willow Flycatcher]] ==
-[[Image:SWFL Pic.jpg|150px]]
-*[[Media:Southwestern Willow Flycatcher- LStevens.m4a|Audio]]
-*[[Southwestern Willow Flycatcher- EP |Script]]
-*[https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2016/1120/ofr20161120.pdf A Satellite Model of Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) Breeding Habitat and a Simulation of Potential Effects of Tamarisk Leaf Beetles (Diorhabda spp.), Southwestern United States]
 =='''Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo'''==

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ------------Portal list on righthand side---------->
 |style="width:60%; font-size:120%;"|
 =='''Extirpated Species'''==