GCDAMP 2016 Fish PEP - Revision history

Cellsworth at 21:46, 10 July 2018

2018-07-10T21:46:46Z

2018-07-10T21:26:50Z

2018-07-10T21:26:29Z

2018-07-10T21:25:50Z

2018-07-10T21:06:11Z

2018-07-10T20:58:39Z

2018-07-10T20:54:22Z

2018-07-10T20:48:44Z

2018-07-10T18:55:49Z

2018-07-09T22:02:17Z

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 |-
-! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Findings </h2>
+! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Findings and Recommendations </h2>
 |-
 |style="color:#000;"|

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ------------Portal list on righthand side---------->
 |style="width:100%; font-size:120%;"|
 == Fish projects in the [[GCDAMP Budget| '''FY15-17 TWP''']]: <br> ==

@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
 Shifts in benthic macrophyte community: consider research / modelling on nutrient assimilation and stoichiometry dynamics and differences in secondary production on different vegetation.
 *Climate Change – need ecosystem and/or bioenergetics modelling.
-*Program should consider TCD as a management option for warming waters – what would effects be on nutrients / temperature and effects for rainbow trout and native species.
+*Program should consider TCD as a management option for warming waters – what would effects be on nutrients / temperature and effects for rainbow trout and native species. [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17apr20/Attach_06b.pdf]
 |}

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 |class="MainPageBG" style="width:55%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top; color:#000;"|
 {|width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff;"
-! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Findings </h2>
+! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Questions </h2>
 |-
 |style="color:#000;"|
+How could the program better balance priorities and trade‐offs focused on research and monitoring of –
 |}

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 |class="MainPageBG" style="width:55%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top; color:#000;"|
 {|width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff;"
-! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Updates</h2>
+! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Findings </h2>
 |-
 |style="color:#000;"|
 |}
@@ Line 108: / Line 73: @@
 |style="color:#000;"|
 *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/16aug24/Attach_07a.pdf  Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center Science Updates (BO Compliance, Trout Updates, Green Sunfish, Fisheries PEP, Partners in Science)]
 *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16oct18/Attach_06.pdf Update on Fisheries PEP]
@@ Line 117: / Line 83: @@
 |style="color:#000;"|
 *[[Media:Fisheries PEP Report 2016-12-27.pdf| GCDAMP PEP Final Report for the Fisheries Program Review, December 27, 2016]]
 *[[Media:GCDAMP FY16 Fisheries PEP Prospectus final.pdf| 2016 Fish PEP Prospectus: Stakeholder Final]]

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 |-
 |style="color:#000;"|
 To TWG members (July 15, 2016):
@@ Line 170: / Line 101: @@
 *[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=PEP_reviews PEP Reviews page]
 *[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=2009_Fish_Monitoring_Program_PEP 2009 Fish Monitoring Program PEP]
 |-

@@ Line 169: / Line 169: @@
 *[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=PEP_reviews PEP Reviews page]
 |-
@@ Line 184: / Line 185: @@
 |-
 ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Reference Material</h2>

@@ Line 192: / Line 192: @@
 Fish PEP participants: Mike Bradford (Chair), Mark Bevelhimer, Michael Hansen, Gordon Mueller, Doug Osmundason, Jim Rice, Dana Winkelman
 *[[Media:GCMRC response.pdf| 2010-11 AMP Fish Monitoring: Incorporating Fish PEP Recommendations]]
 *[[Media:Fish PEP report final Sept 30 09 (1).pdf| 2009 Fish PEP Final Report (9/09)]]

@@ Line 208: / Line 208: @@
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09aug12/Attach_05b.pdf Fiscal Year 2010-11 AMP Fish Monitoring: Incorporating Protocol Review PPT]
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09sep29/Attach_06.pdf Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center Updates]
 |-

@@ Line 207: / Line 207: @@
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10feb03/Attach_22.pdf AIF: 1) GCMRC Updates; The 2009 Fishery PEP Review - Next Steps in Development of Core Monitoring Plan below Glen Canyon Dam ]
 *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09aug12/Attach_05b.pdf Fiscal Year 2010-11 AMP Fish Monitoring: Incorporating Protocol Review PPT]
 |-