Difference between revisions of "Science Advisors"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
(add) |
(fix) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | [[File:Important Science Insight of 2012 page 1.jpg|400px|left]] | + | *[[File:Important Science Insight of 2012 page 1.jpg|400px|left]] |
| − | [http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/13feb20/Attach_07b.pdf| LINK: usbr/amwg/mtgs/13feb20/Attach_07b.pdf] | + | *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/13feb20/Attach_07b.pdf| LINK: usbr/amwg/mtgs/13feb20/Attach_07b.pdf] |
Revision as of 12:13, 6 March 2013
TBD
- FROM: Anne Castle
- DATE: March 31, 2011
- RE: "GCMRC Science Planning"
- "Our first and foremost priority is complance with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the humpback chub.
- "Second, we need to focus on sediment, which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..."
- "Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both non-native fish control and the recreational trout fishery.
- "These are the primary areas where I have asked GCMRC to concentrate its resources."
