Difference between revisions of "Science Advisors"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
(add folder) |
(add) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Infobox Person | |
| + | |name = Rapid Response Manuscript | ||
| + | |image = Rapid Response- Analysis-PIC.jpg | ||
| + | |alma_mater = | ||
| + | |Job Title = | ||
| + | |Previous_Title_ = | ||
| + | |Previous_Title_ = | ||
| + | |spouse = | ||
| + | |children = | ||
| + | |birth_date = | ||
| + | |birth_place = | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
== [[SCIENCE TRIPS Schedule| SCINECE TRIPS]] == | == [[SCIENCE TRIPS Schedule| SCINECE TRIPS]] == | ||
Revision as of 12:03, 17 July 2013
| Rapid Response Manuscript | |
 |
SCINECE TRIPS
- FROM: Anne Castle
- DATE: March 31, 2011
- RE: "GCMRC Science Planning"
- "Our first and foremost priority is complance with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the humpback chub.
- "Second, we need to focus on sediment, which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..."
- "Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both non-native fish control and the recreational trout fishery.
- "These are the primary areas where I have asked GCMRC to concentrate its resources."
