Difference between revisions of "Bishop Study"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 74: Line 74:
  
 
'''2000''' <br>
 
'''2000''' <br>
[http://www.gcmrc.gov/library/reports/cultural/Recreation/Stewart2000.pdf The Stewart Report: Preferences of Recreation User Groups of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. 2000]
+
*[http://www.gcmrc.gov/library/reports/cultural/Recreation/Stewart2000.pdf The Stewart Report: Preferences of Recreation User Groups of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. 2000]
  
 
'''1987''' <br>
 
'''1987''' <br>
[http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/cwa316/docs/cwa316may2010/comments041310/bishop_etal.pdf The Bishop Study: Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation. 1987. pg 407-436 ]<br>
+
*[http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/cwa316/docs/cwa316may2010/comments041310/bishop_etal.pdf The Bishop Study: Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation. 1987. pg 407-436 ]<br>
[[File:1987 Bishop GCDam releases downstream rec analysis user pref.pdf| The Bishop Study: Glen Canyon Dam Releases and Down Stream Recreation: An Analysis of User Preferences and Economic Values. 1987. Report to GCES. 398 pgs. ]]
+
*[[Media:1987 Bishop GCDam releases downstream rec analysis user pref.pdf| The Bishop Study: Glen Canyon Dam Releases and Down Stream Recreation: An Analysis of User Preferences and Economic Values. 1987. Report to GCES. 398 pgs. ]]
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 09:10, 28 August 2019





--- --- ---

Summary

Issues

In Bishop et al. (1987; on page 410 of the 30 page report: “Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation) fluctuating flows are defined as any operation where the daily flow fluctuation was equal to or more than 10,000 cfs/day. Bishop treated daily flow fluctuations of less than 10,000 cfs/day as “constant flow releases.” Bishop identified that this “10,000 cfs threshold was determined to be the point at which fluctuations begin to be perceptible to recreationists.”

Additionally, Stewart et al.’s (2000) follow-up of the Bishop et al. (1987) study found that angler’s did not identify river level fluctuations, at least under the MLFF operating regime, as an issue. Based on information from Stewart et al (2000) and Bishop et al. (1987), any flow fluctuation below 10,000 cfs/day should be treated the same as a steady flow release.



INFORMATION


Reports and Links

2000

1987

Other Stuff