Difference between revisions of "Translocation Projects"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | [[Image:chub bucket NPS.jpg|center|600px]] | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
− | == | + | ==Chute Falls Translocation (Little Colorado River)== |
− | == | + | ===Background [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/13jan24/11_Young.pdf]=== |
+ | *Prior to translocations: no HBC above Chute Falls (fish barrier or high CO2 levels). Since 2003, six chub have been documented ascending Chute Falls on their own accord. [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_07.pdf] | ||
+ | *High productivity and higher winter water temperatures than the lower LCR should equal higher growth rates and faster maturity | ||
+ | *Translocations began 2003 | ||
+ | *~3,106 juvenile humpback chub have been translocated from the lower reaches of the LCR to upstream of Chute Falls (2015) [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_07.pdf] | ||
+ | *Annual Monitoring – hoop nets surveys in May or June | ||
− | == | + | ===Objectives=== |
+ | '''2003-2005 [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/13jan24/11_Young.pdf]''' | ||
+ | *Determine if HBC can survive and remain above Chute Falls: yes, translocated fish had higher survival than Coggins et al. 2006 estimate. Good retention during most years but populations is susceptible to stochastic events (e.g. 2010 flood) | ||
+ | *Determine if HBC grow (given increased food availability, but potential detrimental impacts from CO2): | ||
+ | #By the 1st ensuing spring since being released 16% of age-1 translocated chub had achieved adult size (>200 mm TL). | ||
+ | #By the 2nd ensuing spring since being released 96% of age-2 chub had achieved adult size. [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_07.pdf] | ||
+ | *Determine if HBC can recruit to adulthood: yes | ||
+ | *Determine if HBC spawning population will develop: tbd | ||
+ | '''2006-Present [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/13jan24/11_Young.pdf]''' | ||
+ | *Conduct mark/recapture population estimates – 2 reaches (>CF and LA to CF) to determine: | ||
+ | #Migration patterns: Chute is not a complete barrier to chub moving upstream, movement throughout, including to the mainstem | ||
+ | #Growth rates: higher growth rates than fish lower in the LCR | ||
+ | #Spawning activity: ripe fish and YOY fish found above Chute in 2007 | ||
+ | #Assess overall benefit to LCR HBC: Appears to be one of few tools available to directly increase adult population if needed in future. | ||
− | Included as a Conservation measure in the 2008 and 2011 Biological <br> | + | Translocations are relatively easy and inexpensive beneficial conservation actions compared to other options that may be much more expensive and politically difficult to implement. [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR13_VanHaverbeke.pdf] |
+ | |||
+ | ==Havasu Creek Translocations== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Shinumo Creek Translocations [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14oct28/Attach_11.pdf]== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Included as a Conservation measure in the 2008 and 2011 Biological Opinions <br> | ||
===Objectives: === | ===Objectives: === | ||
Line 81: | Line 106: | ||
*In 3-5 years restore native fish community throughout watershed (humpback chub, speckled dace, bluehead sucker) | *In 3-5 years restore native fish community throughout watershed (humpback chub, speckled dace, bluehead sucker) | ||
− | ==Bright Angel Creek (proposed; following [https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/nature/trout-reduction.htm NPS trout reduction])== | + | ==Bright Angel Creek Translocations (proposed; following [https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/nature/trout-reduction.htm NPS trout reduction])== |
− | == | + | ==Beaver Falls Translocations (Havasu Creek) (proposed; Conservation Measure)== |
− | ==Mainstem | + | ==Mainstem Translocations in Western Grand Canyon (proposed)== |
− | ==Mainstem | + | ==Mainstem Translocations at the LCR (proposed; Conservation Measure)== |
|} | |} | ||
Line 139: | Line 164: | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
− | + | [[Image:GoldenChub.jpg|center|400px]] | |
+ | The Golden Chub | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 10:56, 5 May 2017
|
|
-- |
-- |
-- |
---|
|
|