Difference between revisions of "Bishop Study"
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
| − | + | [[File:Granite Gorge- SJansen.JPG|thumbnail|center|300px]] | |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|style="width:60%; font-size:95%;"| | |style="width:60%; font-size:95%;"| | ||
| + | ==The 1987 Bishop Study == | ||
| + | The research reported here focused on the effects of Glen Canyon Dam operations on the quality of | ||
| + | recreation downstream. Two types of | ||
| + | recreation were studied in detail, fishing and white-water boating. From a recreational | ||
| + | perspective, different discharges from the dam affect the conditions under which downstream fishing | ||
| + | and white-water boating occur. Flows in the river could be a significant determinant of | ||
| + | recreational quality. | ||
| − | ---- | + | The study was conducted as part of the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies (GCES), a multi-agency |
| + | effort to examine the impacts of dam operations on the environmental and recreational resources | ||
| + | downstream. The mission of the initial phase of GCES was to determine whether operations were | ||
| + | adversely affecting downstream environmental and recreational resources and, if so, whether ways | ||
| + | could be found, within existing institutional constraints, to improve or better protect | ||
| + | environmental and recreational resources. The overall goal of GCES -- and hence the work on | ||
| + | recreation reported here -- was | ||
| + | not to prescribe specific actions to be taken, since this would have involved much broader | ||
| + | trade-offs between recreation, power generation, environmental effects, and other social | ||
| + | objectives. Rather, our goals were the more limited ones of determining the effects of dam | ||
| + | operations on recreational quality and developing options that would benefit recreation considered | ||
| + | alone. The results reported here will eventually be combined with results from studies on the | ||
| + | downstream environment, electric power generation, and other resources in order to construct and | ||
| + | evaluate dam management options. | ||
| + | We used dollar measures to quantify recreational impacts. Thus, the study design, as described | ||
| + | later in the paper, was built on theoretical links between environmental quality and consumer | ||
| + | surplus explored thoroughly by Maler (1974) and Freeman (1979). Using dollar values not only | ||
| + | conveys recreational quality impacts in a commonly used metric, but may also eventually facilitate | ||
| + | the analysis of trade-offs between recreation and other goals using the tools of benefit-cost | ||
| + | analysis. | ||
| + | In the next section, the relationships between dam operations and recreation will be explored. | ||
| + | Following this, the design of the study is summarized and the measured consumer surplus values for | ||
| + | fishing and boating reported. We then illustrate ways that dam operations could be modified to | ||
| + | improve downstream recreation.[http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/cwa316/docs/cwa316may2010/comments041310/bishop_etal.pdf] | ||
|}<!-- | |}<!-- | ||
| Line 42: | Line 72: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> | + | ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> The 8k Cap </h2> |
|- | |- | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
Revision as of 09:37, 28 August 2019
|
|
The 1987 Bishop StudyThe research reported here focused on the effects of Glen Canyon Dam operations on the quality of recreation downstream. Two types of recreation were studied in detail, fishing and white-water boating. From a recreational perspective, different discharges from the dam affect the conditions under which downstream fishing and white-water boating occur. Flows in the river could be a significant determinant of recreational quality. The study was conducted as part of the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies (GCES), a multi-agency effort to examine the impacts of dam operations on the environmental and recreational resources downstream. The mission of the initial phase of GCES was to determine whether operations were adversely affecting downstream environmental and recreational resources and, if so, whether ways could be found, within existing institutional constraints, to improve or better protect environmental and recreational resources. The overall goal of GCES -- and hence the work on recreation reported here -- was not to prescribe specific actions to be taken, since this would have involved much broader trade-offs between recreation, power generation, environmental effects, and other social objectives. Rather, our goals were the more limited ones of determining the effects of dam operations on recreational quality and developing options that would benefit recreation considered alone. The results reported here will eventually be combined with results from studies on the downstream environment, electric power generation, and other resources in order to construct and evaluate dam management options. We used dollar measures to quantify recreational impacts. Thus, the study design, as described later in the paper, was built on theoretical links between environmental quality and consumer surplus explored thoroughly by Maler (1974) and Freeman (1979). Using dollar values not only conveys recreational quality impacts in a commonly used metric, but may also eventually facilitate the analysis of trade-offs between recreation and other goals using the tools of benefit-cost analysis. In the next section, the relationships between dam operations and recreation will be explored. Following this, the design of the study is summarized and the measured consumer surplus values for fishing and boating reported. We then illustrate ways that dam operations could be modified to improve downstream recreation.[1] |
| --- | --- | --- |
|---|
|
|
