Difference between revisions of "Science Advisors"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
(add) |
(add) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[SCIENCE LEARNINGS PAGE| Under Construction- Try back later]] | [[SCIENCE LEARNINGS PAGE| Under Construction- Try back later]] | ||
| − | *"We need a science that empowers decision makers to develop a comprehensive vision of how a future Colorado River function." (JSchmit_SDM-workshop_Aug 2013) | + | *"We need a science that empowers decision makers to develop a comprehensive vision of how a future Colorado River can function." (JSchmit_SDM-workshop_Aug 2013) |
Revision as of 10:11, 21 August 2013
SCINECE TRIPS
- FROM: Anne Castle
- DATE: March 31, 2011
- RE: "GCMRC Science Planning"
- "Our first and foremost priority is complance with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the humpback chub.
- "Second, we need to focus on sediment, which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..."
- "Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both non-native fish control and the recreational trout fishery.
- "These are the primary areas where I have asked GCMRC to concentrate its resources."
Under Construction
Under Construction- Try back later
- "We need a science that empowers decision makers to develop a comprehensive vision of how a future Colorado River can function." (JSchmit_SDM-workshop_Aug 2013)
