Difference between revisions of "Portal:GCDAMP DOI Direction"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
(add priorites from anne castle) |
(sp) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*DATE: March 31, 2011 | *DATE: March 31, 2011 | ||
*RE: "GCMRC Science Planning" | *RE: "GCMRC Science Planning" | ||
| − | #"Our first and foremost priority is '''complance''' with the Endangered Species Act, which | + | #"Our first and foremost priority is '''complance''' with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the '''humpback chub'''. |
#"Second, we need to focus on '''sediment''', which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..." | #"Second, we need to focus on '''sediment''', which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..." | ||
#"Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both '''non-native fish control''' and the '''recreational trout fishery'''.'' | #"Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both '''non-native fish control''' and the '''recreational trout fishery'''.'' | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 11 October 2012
TBD
- FROM: Anne Castle
- DATE: March 31, 2011
- RE: "GCMRC Science Planning"
- "Our first and foremost priority is complance with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the humpback chub.
- "Second, we need to focus on sediment, which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..."
- "Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both non-native fish control and the recreational trout fishery.
- "These are the primary areas where I have asked GCMRC to concentrate its resources."
