Difference between revisions of "GCDAMP Glen Canyon Dam"

[2]

USBR Monthly/Annual Reports

• Upper Colorado Region Water Operations site
• 24-Month Study
• Monthly Summaries
• Annual Operating Plans for Colorado River reservoirs

Report to Congress Regarding Operations of Glen Canyon Dam

• 2015-2016 Report to Congress
• 2014-2015 Report to Congress
• 2013-2014 Report to Congress
• 2010-2011 Report to Congress
• 1999-2001 Report to Congress
• 1998-1999 Report to Congress

• 1997 Operating Criteria for Glen Canyon Dam

2017

• Basin Hydrology, Operations and 2018 Hydrograph

2016

• FILL MEAD FIRST: A technical assessment (Summary)
• FILL MEAD FIRST: A technical assessment (Analysis)
• Basin Hydrology and Water Year (WY) 2017 Hydrograph
• August 2016 DOI-DOE Federal Family call on Glen Canyon Operations
• Basin Hydrology, Operations, and 2017 Hydrograph
• TWG: Basin Hydrology, Operations, and 2017 Hydrograph
• AMWG: Basin Hydrology, Operations, and 2017 Hydrograph
• Glen Canyon Dam operations during equalization

2015

• 2016 Annual Operating Plan
• AMWG: Basin Hydrology and WY 2016 Hydrograph
• TWG: Hydrology Update and 2016 Hydrograph
• Panel on Current Projects and Issues in Utah
• Central Utah Project
• Meeting the Mitigation Requirement for the Bonneville Unit CUP
• Current Projects and Issues in Utah
• Provo Area Office

2014

• Colorado River Annual Operating Plan and Drought Contingency Planning
• Basin Hydrology, Operations
• DOI-DOE Hydrograph Development for Water Year 2015
• Basin Hydrology, Operations, and 2015 Hydrograph and Development of Water Year 2015 Hydrograph
• Basin Hydrology, Operations, and 2015 Hydrograph
• Panel on the Potential Effects of Long-Term Drought on Colorado River Operations
• Near Term Risks: Options to Address Declining Reservoirs
• State of Nevada Concerns

2013

• Colorado River Basin Hydrology and Projected Glen Canyon Dam Operations

In addition to daily scheduled fluctuations for power generation, the instantaneous releases from Glen Canyon Dam may also fluctuate to provide 40 megawatts (mw) of system regulation. These instantaneous release adjustments stabilize the electrical generation and transmission system and translate to a range of about 1,200 cfs above or below the hourly scheduled release rate. Under system normal conditions, fluctuations for regulation are typically short lived and generally balance out over the hour with minimal or no noticeable impacts on downstream river flow conditions.

Releases from Glen Canyon Dam can also fluctuate beyond scheduled releases when called upon to respond to unscheduled power outages or power system emergencies. Depending on the severity of the system emergency, the response from Glen Canyon Dam can be significant, within the full range of the operating capacity of the power plant for as long as is necessary to maintain balance in the transmission system. Glen Canyon Dam typically maintains 30 mw (approximately 880 cfs) of generation capacity in reserve in order to respond to a system emergency even when generation rates are already high. System emergencies occur fairly infrequently and typically require small responses from Glen Canyon Dam. However, these responses can have a noticeable impact on the river downstream of Glen Canyon Dam. [3]

Video of the construction of Glen Canyon Dam

• HOW ITS MADE - The Glen Canyon Dam

1983 flood videos and spillway repairs

• Challenge at Glen Canyon (Part 1)
• Challenge at Glen Canyon (Part 2)
• Challenge at Glen Canyon (Part 3)

What is the total release (CFS) possible from Glen Canyon Dam?

• Total release during a HFE = Power plant capacity + 15,000 cfs through the bypass tubes
• Capacity depends on how many of the 8 units are available. [4]