Difference between revisions of "Bishop Study"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "---- __NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__ <!-- ------------------------------Banner across top of page------------------------------> {| style="width:100%; background:#fcfcfc; margi...")
 
Line 30: Line 30:
 
----------Strapline immediately below banner---------->
 
----------Strapline immediately below banner---------->
 
{| style="width:100%; height:50px" border=1px solid #ccc; background:#cedff2
 
{| style="width:100%; height:50px" border=1px solid #ccc; background:#cedff2
! style="width=33%; background:#cedff2;" | [[TBD]]<br>
+
! style="width=33%; background:#cedff2;" | [[TBD|---]]
! style="width=33%; background:#cedff2;" | [[TBD|TBD]] <br>(TBD)<br>
+
! style="width=33%; background:#cedff2;" | [[TBD|---]]
 
+
! style="width=33%; background:#cedff2;" | [[TBD|---]]
! style="width=33%; background:#cedff2;" | [[TBD|TBD]]<br>(TBD)
+
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 39: Line 38:
 
|class="MainPageBG" style="width:55%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top; color:#000;"|
 
|class="MainPageBG" style="width:55%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top; color:#000;"|
 
{|width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff;"
 
{|width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff;"
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">GROUP MEMBERS</h2>
+
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Summary</h2>
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 45: Line 44:
  
 
|-
 
|-
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">News</h2>
+
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Issues</h2>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|  
 
|style="color:#000;"|  
  
 
+
In Bishop et al. (1987; on page 410 of the 30 page report: “Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation) '''fluctuating flows''' are defined as any operation where the daily flow fluctuation was equal to or more than 10,000 cfs/day. Bishop treated daily flow fluctuations of less than 10,000 cfs/day as “constant flow releases.” Bishop identified that this “'''10,000 cfs threshold''' was determined to be the point at which fluctuations begin to be perceptible to recreationists.” Additionally and as identified on Page 4-269 line 20 of this EIS, Stewart et al.’s (2000) follow-up of the Bishop et al. (1987) study found that angler’s '''did not''' identify river level fluctuations, at least under the MLFF operating regime, as an issue. Based on information from Stewart et al (2000) and Bishop et al. (1987), '''any flow fluctuation below 10,000 cfs/day should be treated the same as a steady flow release'''.
 
+
 
+
----
+
===''Quick Facts''===
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
'''Visitor Use and Experience'''
+
 
+
  
 
----
 
----
  
 
|}
 
|}
 
'''HISTORY''' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
Line 89: Line 70:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
[http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/cwa316/docs/cwa316may2010/comments041310/bishop_etal.pdf '''Bishop Study (30 page report)''']
 
  
 +
2000 <br>
 
[http://www.gcmrc.gov/library/reports/cultural/Recreation/Stewart2000.pdf '''Stewart 2000 Report ''']
 
[http://www.gcmrc.gov/library/reports/cultural/Recreation/Stewart2000.pdf '''Stewart 2000 Report ''']
 +
 +
1987 <br>
 +
[http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/cwa316/docs/cwa316may2010/comments041310/bishop_etal.pdf '''Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation; i.e. The Bishop Study; pg 407-436 ''']
 +
 
|-
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Other Stuff</h2>
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Other Stuff</h2>

Revision as of 14:45, 2 June 2016





--- --- ---

Summary

Issues

In Bishop et al. (1987; on page 410 of the 30 page report: “Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation) fluctuating flows are defined as any operation where the daily flow fluctuation was equal to or more than 10,000 cfs/day. Bishop treated daily flow fluctuations of less than 10,000 cfs/day as “constant flow releases.” Bishop identified that this “10,000 cfs threshold was determined to be the point at which fluctuations begin to be perceptible to recreationists.” Additionally and as identified on Page 4-269 line 20 of this EIS, Stewart et al.’s (2000) follow-up of the Bishop et al. (1987) study found that angler’s did not identify river level fluctuations, at least under the MLFF operating regime, as an issue. Based on information from Stewart et al (2000) and Bishop et al. (1987), any flow fluctuation below 10,000 cfs/day should be treated the same as a steady flow release.



INFORMATION


Reports and Links

2000
Stewart 2000 Report

1987
Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation; i.e. The Bishop Study; pg 407-436

Other Stuff









ADDITIONAL LINKS