Difference between revisions of "Bishop Study"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 48: Line 48:
 
|style="color:#000;"|  
 
|style="color:#000;"|  
  
In Bishop et al. (1987; on page 410 of the 30 page report: “Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation) '''fluctuating flows''' are defined as any operation where the daily flow fluctuation was equal to or more than 10,000 cfs/day. Bishop treated daily flow fluctuations of less than 10,000 cfs/day as “constant flow releases.” Bishop identified that this “'''10,000 cfs threshold''' was determined to be the point at which fluctuations begin to be perceptible to recreationists.” Additionally and as identified on Page 4-269 line 20 of this EIS, Stewart et al.’s (2000) follow-up of the Bishop et al. (1987) study found that angler’s '''did not''' identify river level fluctuations, at least under the MLFF operating regime, as an issue. Based on information from Stewart et al (2000) and Bishop et al. (1987), '''any flow fluctuation below 10,000 cfs/day should be treated the same as a steady flow release'''.  
+
In Bishop et al. (1987; on page 410 of the 30 page report: “Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation) fluctuating flows are defined as any operation where the daily flow fluctuation was equal to or more than 10,000 cfs/day. Bishop treated daily flow fluctuations of less than 10,000 cfs/day as “constant flow releases.” Bishop identified that this “10,000 cfs threshold was determined to be the point at which fluctuations begin to be perceptible to recreationists.” Additionally and as identified on Page 4-269 line 20 of this EIS, Stewart et al.’s (2000) follow-up of the Bishop et al. (1987) study found that angler’s did not identify river level fluctuations, at least under the MLFF operating regime, as an issue. Based on information from Stewart et al (2000) and Bishop et al. (1987), '''any flow fluctuation below 10,000 cfs/day should be treated the same as a steady flow release'''.  
  
 
----
 
----
Line 71: Line 71:
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
2000 <br>
+
'''2000''' <br>
 
[http://www.gcmrc.gov/library/reports/cultural/Recreation/Stewart2000.pdf '''The Stewart Report: Preferences of Recreation User Groups of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. 2000 ''']
 
[http://www.gcmrc.gov/library/reports/cultural/Recreation/Stewart2000.pdf '''The Stewart Report: Preferences of Recreation User Groups of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. 2000 ''']
  
1987 <br>
+
'''1987''' <br>
[http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/cwa316/docs/cwa316may2010/comments041310/bishop_etal.pdf '''The Bishop Study: Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation. 1987. pg 407-436 ''']<br>
+
[http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/cwa316/docs/cwa316may2010/comments041310/bishop_etal.pdf The Bishop Study: Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation. 1987. pg 407-436 ]<br>
[[File:1987 Bishop GCDam releases downstream rec analysis user pref.pdf| '''The Bishop Study: Glen Canyon Dam Releases and Down Stream Recreation: An Analysis of User Preferences and Economic Values. 1987. Report to GCES. 398 pgs. ''']]
+
[[File:1987 Bishop GCDam releases downstream rec analysis user pref.pdf| The Bishop Study: Glen Canyon Dam Releases and Down Stream Recreation: An Analysis of User Preferences and Economic Values. 1987. Report to GCES. 398 pgs. ]]
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 12:38, 22 September 2016





--- --- ---

Summary

Issues

In Bishop et al. (1987; on page 410 of the 30 page report: “Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation) fluctuating flows are defined as any operation where the daily flow fluctuation was equal to or more than 10,000 cfs/day. Bishop treated daily flow fluctuations of less than 10,000 cfs/day as “constant flow releases.” Bishop identified that this “10,000 cfs threshold was determined to be the point at which fluctuations begin to be perceptible to recreationists.” Additionally and as identified on Page 4-269 line 20 of this EIS, Stewart et al.’s (2000) follow-up of the Bishop et al. (1987) study found that angler’s did not identify river level fluctuations, at least under the MLFF operating regime, as an issue. Based on information from Stewart et al (2000) and Bishop et al. (1987), any flow fluctuation below 10,000 cfs/day should be treated the same as a steady flow release.



INFORMATION


Reports and Links

2000
The Stewart Report: Preferences of Recreation User Groups of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. 2000

1987
The Bishop Study: Grand Canyon Recreation and Glen Canyon Dam Operations: An Economic Evaluation. 1987. pg 407-436
File:1987 Bishop GCDam releases downstream rec analysis user pref.pdf

Other Stuff









ADDITIONAL LINKS