Difference between revisions of "CULTURAL"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 82: Line 82:
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
 +
*[[Tribal Resources]]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_CRAHG_Page Cultural Resources (CRAHG) AdHoc Group]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_CRAHG_Page Cultural Resources (CRAHG) AdHoc Group]
*[[Tribal Resources]]
 
*[http://itcaonline.com/?page_id=1160 Havasupai]
 
*[http://www.hopi-nsn.gov/ Hopi]
 
*[http://hualapai-nsn.gov/ Hualapai]
 
*[http://www.navajo-nsn.gov/ Navajo]
 
*[http://www.kaibabpaiute-nsn.gov/SPC.html Southern Paiute Consortium]
 
*[http://www.ashiwi.org/ Zuni]
 
 
 
*[http://www.gcmrc.gov/research_areas/cultural_resources/cultural_resources_default.aspx USGS-GCMRC Cultural Resources Link]
 
*[http://www.gcmrc.gov/research_areas/cultural_resources/cultural_resources_default.aspx USGS-GCMRC Cultural Resources Link]
  
Line 107: Line 100:
 
'''2017'''
 
'''2017'''
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf Fluvial-aeolian sediment connectivity during the current HFE protocol: alteration on fluvial-aeolian sediment connectivity in Grand Canyon PPT]
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf Fluvial-aeolian sediment connectivity during the current HFE protocol: alteration on fluvial-aeolian sediment connectivity in Grand Canyon PPT]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR7_Cannon.pdf Kinship on the Canyon: Hualapai Stories of Success PPT]
 
  
 
'''2016'''
 
'''2016'''
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16jan26/documents/AR03_Buscombe.pdf Observations of sand dune migration on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon using high-resolution multibeam bathymetry]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16jan26/documents/AR03_Buscombe.pdf Observations of sand dune migration on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon using high-resolution multibeam bathymetry]
*[[Media:Parks, Petroglyphs, Fish, and Zuni DongoskeandHaysGilpin 2016 (2).pdf| Relating to Rock Art in The Contemporary World: Navigating Symbolism, Meaning, and Significance]]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/16aug24/Attach_09.pdf Tribal Liaison Report]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/16aug24/Attach_10.pdf  Stakeholder’s Perspective: The River of Never-Ending Life – Cultural Resources from Navajo and “TCP Core Values Nihosdzaan Doo’ Dahodiyhngoo Ba’ Hayaa”]
 
  
 
'''2015'''
 
'''2015'''
*[https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwY-Z2c3NTUGT1NaNlRGbXk2OU0/view Tribal Liaison Report]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15apr21/Attach_09c.pdf Changes in the Distribution and Abundance of Culturally-Important Plants in the Colorado River Ecosystem: A Pilot Study to Explore Relationships Between Vegetation Change and Traditional Cultural Values]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/15feb25/Attach_06.pdf Joint Tribal Liaison Report]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15apr21/Attach_09b.pdf Southern Paiute Vegetation and Cultural Resource Monitoring Program]
 
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_03.pdf Conditions and Processes affecting sand resources at archaeological sites]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_03.pdf Conditions and Processes affecting sand resources at archaeological sites]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_04.pdf Cultural Site Monitoring in Glen and Grand Canyons]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_04.pdf Cultural Site Monitoring in Glen and Grand Canyons]
  
 
'''2014'''
 
'''2014'''
*[[Media:140322 ProgrammaticAgreements Compliance- Mike Yeatts.pdf| Programmatic Agreements Compliance Document- Michael Yeatts]]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14oct28/Attach_06a.pdf Navajo Nation Concerns]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14oct28/Attach_06b.pdf The Hopi Tribe Landscape]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14oct28/Attach_07a.pdf Navajo Nation Perspectives]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14oct28/Attach_07b.pdf The Hopi Landscape]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/Attach_03a.pdf Joint Tribal Liaison Report]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/Attach_03b.pdf Secretarial Order signed by Secretary Sally Jewell;]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/Attach_03c.pdf Federal Tribal Liaison Report]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14apr08/Attach_06.pdf Reclamation Cultural Program and Programmatic Agreement Update]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14feb19/Attach_05.pdf Tribal Liaison Report]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14feb19/Attach_09.pdf National Historic Preservation Act Update]
 
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/Attach_07.pdf Cultural Resources Ad Hoc Group Report ]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/Attach_07.pdf Cultural Resources Ad Hoc Group Report ]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/AR_Fairley_Landscape-scale.pdf Landscape-scale management implications of cultural resource studies (Fairley)]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/AR_Fairley_Landscape-scale.pdf Landscape-scale management implications of cultural resource studies (Fairley)]
  
 
'''2013'''
 
'''2013'''
* [[Media:2013zebratail.finalannualreport.withedits.pdf|Zebratail lizard reintroduction at Diamond Creek - Final Annual Report]]
 
*[[Media:PricingtrainingpowerpointMarianneTribetwohourFINAL (1).pdf|  USBR Presentation to tribes- May 9, 2013: When should a cost and/or price analysis be performed?]] [[Media:Handouts.zip| Support Material]]
 
  
 
'''2011'''
 
'''2011'''
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/11aug24/Attach_06.pdf Bigger sand bars during the windy season in spring provide a source area for sand to blow upslope to cover some archeological sites]
 
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/11aug24/Attach_06.pdf Bigger sand bars during the windy season in spring provide a source area for sand to blow upslope to cover some archeological sites]
  
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Tribal Monitoring Reports</h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
 
'''2016'''
 
* [[Media:Final River Trip Report 021217 (1).pdf|Hualapai monitoring report]]
 
* [[Media:CPO - 2016 Annual Monitoring Report.pdf|Hopi monitoring report]]
 
 
'''2015'''
 
* [[Media:2015 SPC Annual Report Final (1).pdf |Southern Paiute Consortium monitoring report]]
 
* [[Media:Final 2015 River Trip Report 011316.pdf | Hualapai monitoring report]]
 
* [[Media:2015 Monitoring Report (1).pdf | Hopi monitoring report]]
 
* [[Media:Zuni2015ColoradoRiverMonitoringReport (2).pdf | Zuni River Monitoring Trip Report]]
 
 
'''2014'''
 
* [[Media:2014 Navajo Nation River Monitoring Trip Report.pdf |Navajo Nation River Monitoring Trip Report]]
 
* [[Media:2014 Hopi.pdf| Hopi Long-Term Monitoring Program for the Grand Canyon]]
 
* [[Media:2014 ZUNI ASSOCIATIVE VALUES IN GRAND CANYON PROJECT.pdf|Zuni Associative Values in Grand Canyon]]
 
* [[Media:Zuni FY2014 GCDAMP Participation Annual Report (3) (1).pdf |Zuni GCDAMP Participation Annual Report]]
 
 
'''2012'''
 
* [[Media:2012 SPC Annual Report final rev.docx| Paiute Annual Monitoring Report]]
 
* [[Media:2012 Monitoring Report.pdf  | Hopi Annual Monitoring Report]]
 
* [[Media:2012 Hualapai doc.pdf  | Hualapai Monitoring Report]]
 
 
'''2011'''
 
* [[Media:2011 Zuni.pdf | Zuni Cultural Resources Monitoring Report]]
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 179: Line 123:
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
*[https://youtu.be/gJSJ28eEUjI Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science: Dr. Leroy Little Bear Talk]
 
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 11:52, 21 February 2017


400px‎

Cultural Resources

The lower reaches of Glen Canyon and the river corridor through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, have been used by humans for at least 13,000 years. Today, at least nine contemporary Native American Tribes claim traditional cultural ties to this area. Grand Canyon National Park contains more than 4,000 documented prehistoric and historic sites, and about 420 of these sites are located in proximity to the Colorado River. The lower reaches of Glen Canyon contain an additional 55 sites.

In addition to archaeological sites, cultural resources along the Colorado River corridor include historic structures and other types of historic properties, as well as biological and physical resources that are of traditional cultural importance to Native American peoples such as springs, unique landforms, mineral deposits, native plant concentrations, and various animal species.

Desired Future Condition for Cultural Resources

Prehistoric Archaeological Sites and Historic Sites:
To the extent feasible, maintain significance and integrity through preservation in place.
• If preservation in place is not feasible or reasonable, then implementation of appropriate preservation treatments will be implemented to ensure reduction or elimination of threats consistent with NPS management policies, tribal traditional values and historic preservation law.
• Public access to historic properties on tribal lands is managed by the respective tribes. On lands administered by the NPS, access to some sites for users of the river corridor is maintained as long as integrity of the sites in not compromised.

Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs):
• Attributes are maintained such as National Register eligibility is not compromised. These attributes will be specific to the traditionally associated peoples and will need to be identified by the federal agencies in consultation with those groups. Attributes may include aspects of location or physical integrity, as well as be intangible elements that link the resource to ongoing traditional cultural practices.
• The ability of traditionally associated people to maintain access to and use of the resources is preserved, in accordance with applicable law.
Culturally appropriate conditions of resources are maintained based on traditional ecological knowledge; integration of the desired condition is included in relevant monitoring and management programs.
• Maintain ongoing consultation with the groups for whom the resource has traditional value. Because the desired condition of a TCP needs to be determined by the group for whom it has the traditional value, ongoing consultation is necessary to assess the condition of the resource.
• Mitigate impacts that affect the integrity of the TCPs. How and if effects can be mitigated will need to be developed in conjunction with the traditionally associated peoples for whom the resource holds value.


Tribal Ecological Knowledge
Cultural Resources Library
Tribal Perspectives

Updates


AeolianResults2017.jpg
[1]


AeolianUpdate2017.jpg
[2]


AeolianOptions.jpg
[3]


AeolianTypes.jpg
[4]



Information and Links

Tribal Concerns

Papers and Presentations

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2011


Other Stuff