Difference between revisions of "Natal Origins Project (NO)"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 65: Line 65:
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
What we found:
+
Initial investigations found:
 
*Efficacy of Mechanical Removal
 
*Efficacy of Mechanical Removal
 
*RBT abundance was high and variable, partially offset by trout immigration
 
*RBT abundance was high and variable, partially offset by trout immigration

Revision as of 17:12, 26 April 2017


NatalOrigins.jpg
  • There is a low probability for an individual fish to move large distances.
  • Abundance is a key factor: the more fish upstream in the Lees Ferry reach = more fish will move downstream
--
--
--

Updates

ReachAbundances.jpg
[1]
EmigrationLargeRecruitmentEvents.jpg
[2]
EmigrationEnvironmentalStressor.jpg
[3]
NOconclusions.jpg
[4]

Links and Information

Background

Initial investigations found:

  • Efficacy of Mechanical Removal
  • RBT abundance was high and variable, partially offset by trout immigration
  • BNT were more predaceous than RBT
  • RBT were more numerous than BNT
  • Predation risk is a function of both density & predatory behavior

Information Needs:

  • What controls trout abundance?
  • Where were RBT migrants originating from?
  • What controls trout abundance?
  • Where were RBT migrants originating from?
  • How many sub-adult HBC move into the mainstem?
  • How variable was subadult HBC survival?
  • Was there a relationship between HBC survival & RBT abundance?

Outcomes:

  • Develop alternative sampling methods for determining trout and chub abundance and vital rates
  • Natal Origin Project: Movement and Trout dynamics
  • NSE/JCM Projects: Juvenile HBC survival and other regulating factors

Presentations and Papers

2017

2016

  • [Natal Origins of Rainbow Trout Project, Years 1-4 (Nov 11 – Dec 15)]

2015

2014

2013

Other Stuff