Difference between revisions of "Portal:GCDAMP DOI Direction"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
(43 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
|class="MainPageBG" style="width:55%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background:#f5fffa; vertical-align:top; color:#000;"|
 
|class="MainPageBG" style="width:55%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background:#f5fffa; vertical-align:top; color:#000;"|
 
{|width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5fffa;"
 
{|width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5fffa;"
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cef2e0; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Budget</h2>
+
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Latest direction from DOI:
 +
</h2>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
Line 44: Line 45:
 
</span>
 
</span>
  
*Reduce time and effort spent on the budget process to allow time for ongoing science efforts
+
==[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2019-08-21-amwg-meeting/20190821-GlenCanyonDamAdaptiveManagementProgramGuidance-508-UCRO.pdf Guidance from Dr. Tim Petty for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program dated August 14, 2019]==
*Future workplans should target its limited resources to the highest priority projects
+
*Balance near- and long-term priorities
+
*Maintain flexibility to respond to changing needs
+
*Use more conservative budget projections based on recent performance of the Consumer Price Index
+
*Identify funding for all work included in the workplan to avoid shortfalls
+
*Clarify procedures and justifications in proposing and making mid-course changes to projects
+
  
|-
+
=== LTEMP Implementation ===
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cef2e0; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Tribal Engagement</h2>
+
*The [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP) LTEMP FEIS and ROD] will be the primary guiding documents
 +
Priorities:
 +
*Management and Experimental Actions
 +
*Mitigation and Environmental Commitments
 +
*Research and Monitoring
  
|-
+
In addition, the Department of Interior has recently prioritized the responsible development and production of renewable energy on federal lands. The GCDAMP is encouraged to work within the LTEMP framework to seek ways to improve the value of the hydropower resource.
|style="color:#000;"|
+
  
*The GCDAMP/Science Advisors Program should explore ways to co-produce with Tribes a useful definition of what cultural resources require attention, and what approaches to evaluation will be meaningful.
+
=== Update Guidance Documents ===
 +
Reclamation, USGS, and other Interior agencies are directed to work with the AMWG to update the [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Planning GCDAMP guiding documents] to reflect and be fully consistent with the priorities outlined in the [http://ltempeis.anl.gov/documents/final-eis/vol1/Chapter_1-Introduction.pdf LTEMP FEIS Section 1.4] and emphasized in [http://ltempeis.anl.gov/documents/docs/LTEMP_ROD.pdf Section 6.1(c) of the LTEMP ROD].
 +
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Strategic_Plan Strategic Plan]
 +
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Planning Vision]
 +
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Planning Mission]
 +
*[http://gcdamp.com/images_gcdamp_com/3/3e/2017_AMWG_Charter.pdf Charter]
  
|-
+
[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Budget TWP and budget] should focus on compliance priorities including:
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cef2e0; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Science Activities under LTEMP</h2>
+
*Maintaining dam releases consistent with applicable laws
 +
*Activities associated with the Endangered Species Act
 +
*Actions necessary for compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act
 +
*Research and monitoring as required by the Grand Canyon Protection Act
  
|-
+
The GCDAMP and AMWG guidance should consider any implications brought on by the:
|style="color:#000;"|
+
*Drought Contingency Planning
 +
*New negotiations of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead
  
*Science in support of Endangered Species Act compliance with an emphasis on humpback chub, razorback sucker, and other native fish as well as the resources that support them throughout the Colorado River Ecosystem.  
+
[https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20171006 LTEMP Scientific Monitoring Plan]
*Science in support of compliance with the Grand Canyon Protection Act, in particular sediment resources.
+
*Will continue to provide a framework for the scientific support needed to comlete the monitoring and experimentation specified in the LTEMP FEIS and ROD
*Science relating cultural and archaeological sites to modern river processes, as well as the role of traditional knowledge in contributing to scientific understanding and river operations.
+
*Will be reviewed every three years with the start of each TWP and updated as needed
*Science on non-native fish (population dynamics, control measures, and the recreational trout fishery) and potentially invasive aquatic species.
+
  
|-
+
Develop and implement monitoring metrics for the [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP) resource goals and objectives] defined in the LTEMP ROD
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cef2e0; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Science Advisors Program</h2>
+
*Interior directs AMWG to develop recommendations for the monitoring metrics to assist Interior in their development
  
|-
+
Future research:
|style="color:#000;"|
+
*Should be tied directly to [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP) LTEMP resource goals and objectives]
 +
*Evaluate the threat posed by [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Nonnative_Invasive_Aquatic_Species invasive non-native species]
 +
*Explore [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Riparian_Vegetation vegetation management] to benefit high value [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=RECREATION recreational beaches] and protect vulnerable [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=CULTURAL archaeological sites]
 +
*Consider impact to [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=HYDROPOWER hydropower] as part of the development of LTEMP experiments and study plans
  
*Review the GCDAMP cultural resources program and work with Tribal members to identify how tribal perspectives and traditional knowledges can be better integrated into the GCDAMP.
+
=== Operating Criteria and Operational Flexibility ===
*Identify GCDAMP knowledge gaps to help guide the development of the next triennial budget and workplan.
+
*Continue to utilize operational flexibility in response to varying hydrological and other resource-related conditions
*Help organize and implement protocol evaluation panels with GCMRC as needed.  
+
*Explore the feasibility of conducting a [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=The_HFE_Page spring HFE], along with modeling for improvements and efficiencies that benefit natural, [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=CULTURAL cultural], [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=RECREATION recreational], and [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=HYDROPOWER hydropower] resources
 +
*Starting point: consider opportunities to conduct higher spring releases within power plant capacity, along with [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=The_HFE_Page spring HFEs] that may be triggered under the current LTEMP Protocol
  
 
|}
 
|}
Line 90: Line 100:
 
|class="MainPageBG" style="width:45%; border:1px solid #cedff2; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top;"|
 
|class="MainPageBG" style="width:45%; border:1px solid #cedff2; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top;"|
 
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff;"
 
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff;"
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Documents and Resources</h2>
+
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Memos and Presentations </h2>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 +
 +
'''2019'''
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2019-08-21-amwg-meeting/20190821-GlenCanyonDamAdaptiveManagementProgramGuidance-508-UCRO.pdf Guidance from Dr. Tim Petty for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program dated August 14, 2019 ]
 +
 +
'''2017'''
 +
* Sept 1, 2017: All FACA and non-FACA Committee that had not already received a waiver from the prohibition on holding meetings can begin to schedule and hold meetings.
 +
*[[Media:Letter Suspension 17may09.pdf| Suspension of all Department of Interior Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Meetings and activities.]]
  
 
'''2016'''
 
'''2016'''
Line 98: Line 115:
  
 
'''2014'''
 
'''2014'''
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/Attach_11.pdf| Report and Recommendations Memo from Secretary's Designee Anne Castle to DOI Secretary Sally Jewell dated Sept. 29, 2014]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2014-08-27-amwg-meeting/Attach_11.pdf Report and Recommendations Memo from Secretary's Designee Anne Castle to DOI Secretary Sally Jewell dated Sept. 29, 2014]
 +
 
 +
'''2013'''
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2013-08-08-amwg-meeting/Attach_14.pdf Report and Recommendations Memo from AS-WS Anne Castle to DOI Secretary Sally Jewell dated December 9, 2013]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2013-01-24-twg-meeting/Attach_08c.pdf Memo from Secretary's Designee Anne Castle to AMWG Dated May 4, 2011, re: TWG and AMWG Suggested Roles]
 +
 
 +
'''2012'''
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-08-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_10.pdf Letter from Anne Castle to the AMWG Dated Sept. 18, 2012, Subj: Experiences from AMWG Field Work Session Held August 31, 2012]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-08-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_11.pdf Report and Recommendations Memo from Secretary Designee to Secretary Salazar Dated January 15, 2013]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2012-06-20-twg-meeting/Attach_03.pdf Directive from Secretary Ken Salazar to DOI Personnel Dated May 23, 2012, Subject: Directive on the Implementation of Research to Improve Conditions in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2012-06-20-twg-meeting/Attach_08f.pdf Memo from AS-WS Anne Castle to USGS/GCMRC Dated March 31, 2011, Subject: GCMRC Science Planning]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-05-10-amwg-meeting/Attach_01.pdf Memo from Secretary Ken Salazar to AS-WS Anne Castle Dated 4/30/12, Subject: Report and Recommendations from GCDAMP Meeting held April 30, 2012.]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2012-04-16-twg-meeting/Attach_08.pdf Memo from TWG Chair to Lori Caramanian on April 19, 2012, Subject: The GCD Technical Work Group Report on Issues for Review by the Department of the Interior on the FY2013-14 Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Budget and Work Plan]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-05-10-amwg-meeting/Attach_04.pdf Report and Recommendations Memo From Secretary's Designee Anne Castle to Secretary Ken Salazar Dated January 15, 2012]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-02-22-amwg-meeting/Attach_03.pdf Report and Recommendations Memo from AS-WS Anne Castle to Secretary Ken Salazar Dated December 5, 2011]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-02-22-amwg-meeting/Attach_18.pdf Memo from AS-WS Anne Castle to the AMWG Members and Alternates Dated Feb. 29, 2012, Subject: Follow up from February 22, 2012 Meeting]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-02-22-amwg-meeting/Attach_19.pdf Memo from AS-WS Anne Castle to Secretary Ken Salazar Dated April 26, 2012, Subject: Report and Recommendations from the GCD AMWG Meeting]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-02-22-amwg-meeting/Attach_20.pdf Memo from Secretary Ken Salazar to AS-WS Anne Castle, Subject: Report and Recommendations from GCD AMWG Meeting Held Feb. 22-23, 2012]
 +
 
 +
'''2011'''
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2011-08-24-amwg-meeting/Attach_10b.pdf E-mail Message from Anne Castle, Subject: Response to Technical Work Group Budget Motion Final 8 18 11]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2011-08-24-amwg-meeting/Attach_19.pdf Memo from AS-WS Anne Castle to Secretary Ken Salazar Dated Dec. 5, 2011, Subj: Report and Recommendations from the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Federal Advisory Committee, May 18, 2011, and August 24-25, 2011, Meetings]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2011-06-28-twg-meeting/Attach_03a.pdf E-mail to AMWG (sent 4/5/11) with Memo from Anne Castle, dated March 31, 2011, Subject: Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center Science Planning]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2011-06-28-twg-meeting/Attach_03c.pdf Memo from Anne Castle, dated May 4, 2011, to the AMWG, Subject: GCDAMP Workplan and Budget -Technical Work Group and Adaptive Management Work Group Suggested Roles]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2011-05-18-amwg-meeting/Attach_11.pdf Memo from AS-WS Anne Castle to Secretary Ken Salazar Dated Dec. 5, 2011, Subj: Report and Recommendations from the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Federal Advisory Committee, May 18, 2011, and August 24-25, 2011, Meetings]
 +
 
 +
'''2010'''
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2010-08-24-amwg-meeting/Attach_16.pdf Report and Recommendation Memo from Secretary's Designee dated Sept. 21, 2010, and Concurrence from Secretary Ken Salazar]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2010-03-15-twg-meeting/Attach_09.pdf Letter from AS-WS Anne Castle to Rick Johnson dated Feb. 22, 2010, Subject: Monthly Distribution from Glen Canyon Dam]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2010-02-03-amwg-meeting/Attach_02.pdf Secretary's Response to April 2009 and August 2009 AMWG Recommendations]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2010-02-03-amwg-meeting/Attach_06b.pdf Text from Secretary Ken Salazar's Speech to the Colorado River Water Users Association]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2010-01-21-twg-meeting/Attach_02b.pdf Anne Castle speech given at Colorado Water Users Association on Dec. 10, 2009]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2010-02-03-amwg-meeting/Attach_24.pdf Memo from Anne Castle to Secretary Salaza, Subject: Report and Recommendations from the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Federal Advisory Committee Dated March 16, 2010]
 +
 
 +
'''2009'''
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-09-29-twg-meeting/Attach_04a.pdf Memo from Anne Castle, Subject: Report and Recommendations from the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Federal Advisory Committee; ]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_02a.pdf Memo from Kameran Onley dated 11/7/08, Subj: Report and Recommendation from the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Federal Advisory Committee]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_02b.pdf Memo from P. Lynn Scarlett dated 12/4/08, Subj: Response to Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive management Work Group Report and Recommendation]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_02c.pdf Memo from Kameran Onley dated 1/16/09, Subj: Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_02d.pdf Memo from Kameran Onley dated 1/16/09, Subj: Transition and Farewell]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_18.pdf Concurrence Memo from DOI Secretary Ken Salazar dated March 26, 2009, Subj: Extension of Members of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group [through Sept. 30, 2009]]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_03a.pdf Kameran Onley Memo dated January 16, 2009, Subject: Transition and Farewell]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_03b.pdf Kameran Onley Memo dated January 16, 2009, Subject: Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group]
  
 
'''1999'''
 
'''1999'''
Line 106: Line 165:
  
  
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">---</h2>
 
  
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
  
  

Revision as of 17:59, 6 February 2020



Latest direction from DOI:

Guidance from Dr. Tim Petty for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program dated August 14, 2019

LTEMP Implementation

Priorities:

  • Management and Experimental Actions
  • Mitigation and Environmental Commitments
  • Research and Monitoring

In addition, the Department of Interior has recently prioritized the responsible development and production of renewable energy on federal lands. The GCDAMP is encouraged to work within the LTEMP framework to seek ways to improve the value of the hydropower resource.

Update Guidance Documents

Reclamation, USGS, and other Interior agencies are directed to work with the AMWG to update the GCDAMP guiding documents to reflect and be fully consistent with the priorities outlined in the LTEMP FEIS Section 1.4 and emphasized in Section 6.1(c) of the LTEMP ROD.

TWP and budget should focus on compliance priorities including:

  • Maintaining dam releases consistent with applicable laws
  • Activities associated with the Endangered Species Act
  • Actions necessary for compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act
  • Research and monitoring as required by the Grand Canyon Protection Act

The GCDAMP and AMWG guidance should consider any implications brought on by the:

  • Drought Contingency Planning
  • New negotiations of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead

LTEMP Scientific Monitoring Plan

  • Will continue to provide a framework for the scientific support needed to comlete the monitoring and experimentation specified in the LTEMP FEIS and ROD
  • Will be reviewed every three years with the start of each TWP and updated as needed

Develop and implement monitoring metrics for the resource goals and objectives defined in the LTEMP ROD

  • Interior directs AMWG to develop recommendations for the monitoring metrics to assist Interior in their development

Future research:

Operating Criteria and Operational Flexibility

  • Continue to utilize operational flexibility in response to varying hydrological and other resource-related conditions
  • Explore the feasibility of conducting a spring HFE, along with modeling for improvements and efficiencies that benefit natural, cultural, recreational, and hydropower resources
  • Starting point: consider opportunities to conduct higher spring releases within power plant capacity, along with spring HFEs that may be triggered under the current LTEMP Protocol

Memos and Presentations

2019

2017

2016

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

1999