Difference between revisions of "CULTURAL"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
In addition to archaeological sites, cultural resources along the Colorado River corridor include historic structures and other types of historic properties, as well as biological and physical resources that are of traditional cultural importance to Native American peoples such as springs, unique landforms, mineral deposits, native plant concentrations, and various animal species. | In addition to archaeological sites, cultural resources along the Colorado River corridor include historic structures and other types of historic properties, as well as biological and physical resources that are of traditional cultural importance to Native American peoples such as springs, unique landforms, mineral deposits, native plant concentrations, and various animal species. | ||
| − | ==[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP) '''LTEMP Resource Goal | + | ==[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP) '''LTEMP Resource Goal''']== |
Maintain the integrity of potentially affected NRHP-eligible or listed historic properties in place, where possible, with preservation methods employed on a site-specific basis. | Maintain the integrity of potentially affected NRHP-eligible or listed historic properties in place, where possible, with preservation methods employed on a site-specific basis. | ||
| − | ==[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Portal:Desired_Future_Conditions_-DFCs '''Desired Future Condition | + | ==[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Portal:Desired_Future_Conditions_-DFCs '''Desired Future Condition''']== |
'''Prehistoric Archaeological Sites and Historic Sites:'''<br> | '''Prehistoric Archaeological Sites and Historic Sites:'''<br> | ||
To the extent feasible, maintain significance and integrity through preservation in place.<br> | To the extent feasible, maintain significance and integrity through preservation in place.<br> | ||
• If preservation in place is not feasible or reasonable, then implementation of appropriate preservation treatments will be implemented to ensure reduction or elimination of threats consistent with NPS management policies, tribal traditional values and historic preservation law.<br> | • If preservation in place is not feasible or reasonable, then implementation of appropriate preservation treatments will be implemented to ensure reduction or elimination of threats consistent with NPS management policies, tribal traditional values and historic preservation law.<br> | ||
• Public access to historic properties on tribal lands is managed by the respective tribes. On lands administered by the NPS, access to some sites for users of the river corridor is maintained as long as integrity of the sites in not compromised.<br> | • Public access to historic properties on tribal lands is managed by the respective tribes. On lands administered by the NPS, access to some sites for users of the river corridor is maintained as long as integrity of the sites in not compromised.<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2025-08-21-amwg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-amwg-draftperformancemetrics-508-20250821.pdf '''Metrics''']== | ||
| + | *Integrity | ||
| + | *Topographic Change at a Sample of Sites | ||
| + | *Change in Vulnerability to Loss of Integrity | ||
|}<!-- | |}<!-- | ||
| Line 54: | Line 59: | ||
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Updates</h2> | ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Updates</h2> | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:2021 DisturbanceType.JPG|center|500px]] [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2022-01-13-twg-meeting/20220113-AnnualReportingMeeting-2021LTEMPArchaeologicalSiteSection106Monitoring-508-UCRO.pdf https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2022-01-13-twg-meeting/20220113-AnnualReportingMeeting-2021LTEMPArchaeologicalSiteSection106Monitoring-508-UCRO.pdf] <br> |
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:2021 Summary.JPG|center|500px]] [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2022-01-13-twg-meeting/20220113-AnnualReportingMeeting-2021LTEMPArchaeologicalSiteSection106Monitoring-508-UCRO.pdf https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2022-01-13-twg-meeting/20220113-AnnualReportingMeeting-2021LTEMPArchaeologicalSiteSection106Monitoring-508-UCRO.pdf] <br> |
| − | [[File:AeolianOptions.jpg|center|500px]] [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf] | + | [[File:AeolianOptions.jpg|center|500px]] [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf] <br> |
| − | [[File:AeolianTypes.jpg|center|500px]] [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf] | + | [[File:AeolianTypes.jpg|center|500px]] [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR5_Sankey.pdf] <br> |
|} | |} | ||
| Line 108: | Line 113: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''2024''' | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2024-08-22-amwg-meeting/20240822-ZuniTribeLittleColoradoRiverWetlandsProgram-508-AMWQD.pdf Zuni Tribe Little Colorado River Wetlands Program ] | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2024-02-29-amwg-meeting/20240229-EffectsDamOperationsArchaeologicalSites-508-UCRO.pdf Effects of dam operations and vegetation management on the preservation and geomorphic condition of archaeological sites ] | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2024-01-25-twg-meeting/20240125-AnnualReportingMeeting-EffectsDamOperationsVegetationManagementPreservationGeomorphicConditionArchaeologicalSites-508-UCRO.pdf Effects of dam operations and vegetation management on the preservation and geomorphic condition of archaeological sites] | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2024-01-25-twg-meeting/20240125-AnnualReportingMeeting-MonitoringPotentialThreatsGrandCanyonRockArt-508-UCRO.pdf Monitoring for Potential Threats to Grand Canyon Rock Art ] | ||
| + | *[[Media:Tango ARM2024 Poster IPDS.pdf| River management influences on archaeological site preservation: Results of more than a decade of monitoring geomorphic change along the Colorado River]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''2023'''' | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2023-04-13-twg-meeting/20230413-Section106NationalHistoricPreservationAct-508-UCRO.pdf Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act] | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2023-01-26-twg-meeting/20230126-AnnualReportingMeeting-ArchaeologicalSitesErodingGrandCanyonOwingSixDecadesGle%20CanyonDamOperations-508-UCRO.pdf Archaeological Sites are Eroding in Grand Canyon Owing to Six Decades of Glen Canyon Dam Operations: Floods, Low Flows and Vegetation Management Can Help] | ||
'''2022''' | '''2022''' | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2022-08-18-amwg-meeting/20220818-Nelson-LTEMP-PA2022Summary_508.pdf Glen Canyon’s LTEMP Annual Cultural PA Meeting 2022] | ||
| + | *[https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2022/1097/ofr20221097.pdf Caster et al., 2022, Terrestrial lidar monitoring of the effects of Glen Canyon Dam operations on the geomorphic condition of archaeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park, 2010–2020] | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2022-02-10-amwg-meeting/20220210-NPS-USGSArchaeologicalSiteMonitoringResearch-508-UCRO.pdf NPS and USGS Archaeological Site Monitoring and Research ] | ||
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2022-01-13-twg-meeting/20220113-AnnualReportingMeeting-2021LTEMPArchaeologicalSiteSection106Monitoring-508-UCRO.pdf 2021 LTEMP Archaeological Site Section 106 Monitoring ] | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2022-01-13-twg-meeting/20220113-AnnualReportingMeeting-2021LTEMPArchaeologicalSiteSection106Monitoring-508-UCRO.pdf 2021 LTEMP Archaeological Site Section 106 Monitoring ] | ||
| + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2022-01-13-twg-meeting/20220113-AnnualReportingMeeting-CulturalBenefitsActionOpportunityFramework-508-UCRO.pdf Cultural Benefits Action Opportunity Framework ] | ||
'''2020''' | '''2020''' | ||
Latest revision as of 10:22, 10 March 2026
  |
Cultural and Archaeological ResourcesThe lower reaches of Glen Canyon and the river corridor through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, have been used by humans for at least 13,000 years. Today, at least nine contemporary Native American Tribes claim traditional cultural ties to this area. Grand Canyon National Park contains more than 4,000 documented prehistoric and historic sites, and about 420 of these sites are located in proximity to the Colorado River. The lower reaches of Glen Canyon contain an additional 55 sites. In addition to archaeological sites, cultural resources along the Colorado River corridor include historic structures and other types of historic properties, as well as biological and physical resources that are of traditional cultural importance to Native American peoples such as springs, unique landforms, mineral deposits, native plant concentrations, and various animal species. LTEMP Resource GoalMaintain the integrity of potentially affected NRHP-eligible or listed historic properties in place, where possible, with preservation methods employed on a site-specific basis. Desired Future ConditionPrehistoric Archaeological Sites and Historic Sites: Metrics
|
| Tribal Ecological Knowledge |
Cultural Resources Library |
Tribal Perspectives |
|---|
