|
|
| (16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 64: |
Line 64: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |style="color:#000;"| | | |style="color:#000;"| |
| | + | |
| | + | ==2026== |
| | + | |
| | + | After careful consideration of management alternatives and evaluation of all authorized purposes and impacts, DOI made the decision to not implement Cool Mix flows in 2026. Efforts instead focused on expanded rapid response removal actions, additional backwater modifications, evaluation of innovative tools, and advancement of durable structural solutions. |
| | | | |
| | ==2025== | | ==2025== |
| Line 286: |
Line 290: |
| | *[[Media:20240500-GCDLTEMP-FinalSEIS-508-AMWD_(2).pdf| 2024 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS)]] | | *[[Media:20240500-GCDLTEMP-FinalSEIS-508-AMWD_(2).pdf| 2024 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS)]] |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/DocLibrary/EnvironmentalImpactStatements/GlenCanyonDamLong-TermExperimentalManagementPlan/20240703-GCDLTEMP-FinalSEIS-RecordofDecision-508-AMWD.pdf 2024 Record of Decision (ROD) for the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) ] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/DocLibrary/EnvironmentalImpactStatements/GlenCanyonDamLong-TermExperimentalManagementPlan/20240703-GCDLTEMP-FinalSEIS-RecordofDecision-508-AMWD.pdf 2024 Record of Decision (ROD) for the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) ] |
| | + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/pdfs/LTEMP/20240408-ModelingImpactsGlenCanyonDamOperationsColoradoRiverResources-508-UCRO.pdf Modeling Impacts Glen Canyon Dam Operations Colorado River Resources] |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/DocLibrary/EnvironmentalAssessments/20230200-GCDSmallmouthBassFlowOps_Draft%20EA_508.pdf 2023 Glen Canyon Dam/ Smallmouth Bass Flow Options Draft Environmental Assessment] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/DocLibrary/EnvironmentalAssessments/20230200-GCDSmallmouthBassFlowOps_Draft%20EA_508.pdf 2023 Glen Canyon Dam/ Smallmouth Bass Flow Options Draft Environmental Assessment] |
| | | | |
| Line 292: |
Line 297: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |style="color:#000;"| | | |style="color:#000;"| |
| | + | |
| | + | '''2026''' |
| | + | *[[Media:2026_Cool_Mix_Flow_Decision_for_Glen_Canyon_Dam.pdf | 2026 Cool Mix Flow Decision for Glen Canyon Dam]] |
| | + | *[[Media:2026_Summer_LTEMP_SEIS_Technical_Report.pdf | 2026 Cool Mix Tech Team Report]] |
| | + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2026-02-26-amwg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-amwg-responsetocoolmix-508-20260226.pdf Response of Smallmouth Bass and Other Species to Cool Mix] |
| | + | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2026-02-26-amwg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-amwg-coolmix-hydropower-508-20260226.pdf Cool Mix Experiment Update - Hydropower] |
| | | | |
| | '''2025''' | | '''2025''' |
| | + | *[https://www.osti.gov/biblio/3407756 Financial Analysis of the Smallmouth Bass Flows implemented at the Glen Canyon Dam during 2025] |
| | + | *[[Media:Informational Memo Reclamation Summary of PI Leadership Team Recommendation.pdf|Informational Memo Reclamation Summary of 2025 PI Leadership Team Recommendation]] |
| | + | *[[Media:Attachment 1 Final Summer 2025 SMB Recommendation and Technical Memo.pdf|Attachment 1: Final Summer 2025 SMB Recommendation and Technical Memo]] |
| | + | *[[Media:Attachment 2 WAPA-CRSP - Minority Report 2025 SEIS bypass v2.pdf|Attachment 2: WAPA-CRSP - Minority Report 2025 SEIS bypass]] |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-12-11-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-coolmixcosthydropower-508-20251211.pdf 2024 & 2025 Coolmix Cost Impacts to Hydropower] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-12-11-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-coolmixcosthydropower-508-20251211.pdf 2024 & 2025 Coolmix Cost Impacts to Hydropower] |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-12-11-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-cool-mix2025-508-20251211.pdf Cool-Mix 2025] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-12-11-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-cool-mix2025-508-20251211.pdf Cool-Mix 2025] |
| Line 300: |
Line 315: |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2024-07-10-twg-meeting/20240710-LTEMPSEISUpdate-508-AMWD.pdf LTEMP SEIS Update] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2024-07-10-twg-meeting/20240710-LTEMPSEISUpdate-508-AMWD.pdf LTEMP SEIS Update] |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-04-10-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-ltempflowexperiments-508-20250410.pdf LTEMP Flow Experiments] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-04-10-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-ltempflowexperiments-508-20250410.pdf LTEMP Flow Experiments] |
| − | *[[Media:Informational Memo Reclamation Summary of PI Leadership Team Recommendation.pdf|Informational Memo Reclamation Summary of 2025 PI Leadership Team Recommendation]]
| |
| − | *[[Media:Attachment 1 Final Summer 2025 SMB Recommendation and Technical Memo.pdf|Attachment 1: Final Summer 2025 SMB Recommendation and Technical Memo]]
| |
| − | *[[Media:Attachment 2 WAPA-CRSP - Minority Report 2025 SEIS bypass v2.pdf|Attachment 2: WAPA-CRSP - Minority Report 2025 SEIS bypass]]
| |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-04-10-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-arm-smallmouthbass-coolmix-508-20250410.pdf Response of Smallmouth Bass and other species to cool mix] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2025-04-10-twg-meeting/uc-gcdamp-twg-arm-smallmouthbass-coolmix-508-20250410.pdf Response of Smallmouth Bass and other species to cool mix] |
| | | | |
| Line 318: |
Line 330: |
| | '''2023''' | | '''2023''' |
| | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2023-01-26-twg-meeting/20230126-TWGMeeting-GlenCanyonDamSmallmouthBassEnvironmentalAssessmentUpdate-508-UCRO.pdf Glen Canyon Dam/Smallmouth Bass Environmental Assessment Update] | | *[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2023-01-26-twg-meeting/20230126-TWGMeeting-GlenCanyonDamSmallmouthBassEnvironmentalAssessmentUpdate-508-UCRO.pdf Glen Canyon Dam/Smallmouth Bass Environmental Assessment Update] |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Other Stuff</h2> | + | ! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Areas where Cool Mix does not work</h2> |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |style="color:#000;"| | | |style="color:#000;"| |
| | | | |
| | + | Cool Mix does not prevent entrainment of smallmouth bass through Glen Canyon Dam and it does not cool spawning and nursery habitats that are disconnected from the mainstem (e.g. the Dam Slough at -15 mile). Fish can and will migrate from the tailwater downstream into Grand Canyon and into areas where temperature control at Glen Canyon Dam cannot reach. If habitat in Grand Canyon is in fact suitable for smallmouth bass establishment (see the Pine et al. 2025 - Yackulic et al. 2026 discussion on the [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Smallmouth_Bass_Page Smallmouth Bass Page]), continued entrainment of juvenile and adult smallmouth bass and the availability of spawning and nursery habitat like the Dam Slough at -15 mile poses similar risks to humpback chub as allowing warmwater releases from Glen Canyon Dam. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Entrainment Entrainment]=== |
| | + | [https://gcdamp.com/images_gcdamp_com/d/d4/Eppehimer_etal_2025_Declining_res_elevations_non-native_fish_passage_CJFAS.pdf Eppehimer et al. (2025)] found that maintaining Lake Powell elevations above 3590 ft (1094 m) would likely minimize propagule pressure from the reservoir and create downstream conditions that minimize smallmouth bass population growth. Smallmouth bass propagule pressure increases dramatically as reservoir elevation declines below 3530 ft (1076 m). [https://coloradoriverrecovery.org/uc/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/02/TechnicalReport-NNA-Breton-2015-161b.pdf Breton et al. (2015)] found that eliminating entrainment from source reservoirs was the only way to reduce smallmouth bass populations to zero in Little Yampa Canyon. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/The_-12_Mile_Slough Water temperatures in backwaters and sloughs]=== |
| | + | The Rapid Response Tech Team reported on 4/22/26 that bluegill and green sunfish had recently spawned in the Dam Slough at river mile -15. Minimum spawning temperatures for bluegill and green sunfish are 17 C and 19 C, respectively. Releases from Glen Canyon Dam during this period were between 10 and 11 C. This shows the ineffectiveness of Cool Mix at cooling spawning and nursery habitats that are exposed to solar heating and isolated from the river and the need to modify these habitats in order to keep them from becoming source areas for invasive fish. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Downstream movement of smallmouth bass === |
| | + | [https://warnercnr.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/04/LFL-154-Hawkins_et_al-2009-Rpt.pdf Hawkins et al. (2009)] found that smallmouth bass in the Yampa River moved long distances both upstream and downstream within short timeframes. They found this high mobility contributes to rapid basin-wide dispersal and complicates nonnative predator suppression efforts aimed at protecting native endangered fish. |
| | | | |
| | |} | | |} |
Implementation
|
2026
After careful consideration of management alternatives and evaluation of all authorized purposes and impacts, DOI made the decision to not implement Cool Mix flows in 2026. Efforts instead focused on expanded rapid response removal actions, additional backwater modifications, evaluation of innovative tools, and advancement of durable structural solutions.
2025
The Cool Mix Alternative was selected with a temperature trigger at RM 30 and an end date of October 20. Cool Mix releases started on August 3 and ran for 2 days. Bypass was stopped flows on August 5 when temperature data from RM 30 came in showing trigger was not yet reached. The trigger was officially reached on August 12 and bypass was re-started then.
2024
The Cool Mix Alternative was implemented from July 9 to November 18, 2024. The temperature trigger was at the Little Colorado River (RM 61) until downstream cooling resulted in warmer release temperatures than at RM 61. At this point the temperature trigger was moved to Glen Canyon Dam releases and the operation continued until release temperatures fell below 15.5 C. A summary report for the 2024 operation can be found at this link.
|
Summary
|
|
The United States (US) Department of the Interior (Department), Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) has published a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the
Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP). The 2024 LTEMP
SEIS revises the 2016 LTEMP Record of Decision (ROD) to address two issues:
(1) responding to the threat of smallmouth bass below Glen Canyon Dam; and
(2) incorporating the latest sediment science to assess when high-flow experiments (HFE) should be conducted.
The proposed federal action considered in the 2024 LTEMP SEIS is to revise two aspects of the
2016 LTEMP ROD. The core focus of the 2024 LTEMP SEIS is the evaluation of sub-annual flow
options designed to disrupt the establishment of smallmouth bass and other warmwater nonnative,
invasive fish below Glen Canyon Dam by limiting additional recruitment, which could threaten
populations of humpback chub (Gila cypha). The humpback chub is a species listed as threatened
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). A range of reservoir releases with varying combinations
of temperature and release volumes was analyzed to assess their effectiveness in disrupting
smallmouth bass spawning and preventing recruiting populations from expanding. Additionally, the
2024 LTEMP SEIS explored changes, using the best available science, to the sediment accounting
periods associated with the LTEMP HFE protocol.
The project area encompasses Glen Canyon Dam and the Colorado River downstream of the dam
to the inlet of Lake Mead. Lake Powell and Lake Mead are not within the project area. The analysis
area may vary depending on the specific being considered. For instance, the cultural
resources analysis encompasses a rim-to-rim area of potential effect, while the socioeconomic and
hydropower analyses include surrounding counties and communities.
The 2024 LTEMP SEIS supplements the December 2016 LTEMP ROD for the 2016 LTEMP Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The 2024 LTEMP SEIS and ROD were prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental
Quality's NEPA regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations 1500—1508), and Department
regulations (43 Code of Federal Regulations 46). The decision made here is based on the Final SEIS
filed with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on May 22, 2024; the EPA published a
notice of availability in the Federal Register on May 31, 2024.
For this ROD, Reclamation has identified the Cool Mix Alternative as the preferred alternative for
potential flow actions to address smallmouth bass during the summer of 2024. The Cool Mix
Alternative would modify Glen Canyon Dam's sub-annual releases with the intent to disrupt the
establishment of smallmouth bass below the dam to meet the purpose and need while minimizing
impacts on other resources. For potential flow-based actions to address smallmouth bass after 2024
(if warranted based on temperature targets), Reclamation will consider the Cool Mix Alternative
along with the other action alternatives described in the 20241-TEMP SEIS, and will make
implementation decisions from 2025 to 2027 based on future actual conditions.
Reclamation has also included adjustments to the high flow experiment (HFE) sediment accounting
period and implementation window. These changes consist of adjusting the semiannual sediment
accounting period to an annual period, with the option to implement a spring or fall HFE release, or
both. If a sediment trigger is met, but an HFE release is not implemented in the fall or spring,
rollover of sediment into the next accounting period would be possible. [2]
|
Purpose and Need
|
Temperature control
The purpose of the 2024 LTEMP SEIS is for Reclamation to analyze additional flow options at
Glen Canyon Dam in response to nonnative, invasive smallmouth bass and other warmwater,
nonnative species recently detected directly below the dam. The recent detection of large numbers
of young-of-year smallmouth bass suggests spawn-mg is occurring for the first time directly below
the dam.
The need is to disrupt the establishment of smallmouth bass below Glen Canyon Dam by
limiting additional recruitment, which could threaten populations of the threatened humpback chub
below the dam.
HFE Protocol
The 2024 LTEMP SEIS's purpose relative to HFE releases is to consider adjusting sediment
accounting periods and HFE implementation windows.
The need is to include the latest scientific
information to improve Reclamation's ability to implement HFE releases, as detailed in the 2016
LTEMP EIS. [3]
|
Alternatives
|
Cool Mix Alternative
The Cool Mix Alternative aims to maintain a daily average water temperature below 15.5 degrees
Celsius (C) (60 degrees Fahrenheit [F]) at the target river mile locations below Glen Canyon Dam
where smallmouth bass could spawn. It would involve strategic water releases from both the
penstocks and river outlet works, with quantities determined by predicted temperatures. Flows
would be triggered when temperatures rise above 15.5C (60F), with variations based on monthly
water volumes and conditions.
Cool Mix with Flow Spike Alternative
The Cool Mix with Flow Spike Alternative would maintain daily average water temperatures below
15.5C (60F) at the target river mile locations below Glen Canyon Dam. It would include up to
three 8-hour flow spikes, with a maximum flow of up to 45,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), to
disrupt spawning in margin habitats. HFE releases could replace flow spikes to maximize sediment
benefits. Water releases would vary monthly based on predicted temperatures. Flow spikes and HFE
releases would be similar but triggered differently. During a flow spike, peak discharge would be up
to 32,000 cfs, moving about 133,000 acre-feet of water over 3 days.
Cold Shock Alternative
The Cold Shock Alternative aims to induce short-duration cold shocks, lowering temperatures to
130C (55.4F) at the target river mile locations below Glen Canyon Dam to disrupt smallmouth bass
spawning and rearing. Flows would be activated when temperatures rise above 15.50 (60 F), with
cold shocks potentially occurring every weekend for up to 12 weekends, lasting 48 hours each. The
goal would be to achieve rapid and sustained cooling of the river to disrupt spawning behavior.
Actual release capacities may vary slightly based on operational constraints, and hydropower releases
are assumed to be 2,000 cfs. Extreme high-temperature scenarios may limit reaching the target
temperatures.
Cold Shock with Flow Spike Alternative
The Cold Shock with Flow Spike Alternative would involve releasing water through the river outlet
works for 48 hours to induce a cold shock downstream to the targeted river mile. Up to three 8-
hour flow spikes may also be implemented if enough water is available to disrupt spawning in
warmer margin habitats. The release quantity would be based on predicted temperatures and
operational constraints, which would vary' throughout the year. This alternative would start when
daily water temperatures at the Little Colorado River reach 15.5C (60F), with weekly 48-hour cold-
shock releases and at least one 8-hour flow spike, lasting up to 12 weeks.
Non-Bypass Alternative
The Non-Bypass Alternative would involve strategic river stage changes along the Lees Ferry reach
to disrupt smallmouth bass nests and spawning activities below Glen Canyon Dam. It would include
a once-weekly, short-duration, low-flow release followed by a short-duration, high-flow release. The
low-flow release would target shallow nesting areas, while the high-flow release would increase water
velocities in deeper habitats. These releases would be designed to attenuate by the time they reach
the Little Colorado River confluence. Flows would start on Sunday nights, peak on Monday
morning, and return to normal by Monday afternoon. The treatment would be repeated weekly
based on water temperature projections. This alternative aims to disrupt smallmouth bass spawning down to river mile 61,
with adjustments possible during implementation.
|
Triggers
|
|
The cold-water alternatives have been modeled for cooling effects at river miles 15 and 61. Modeling
these locations provides a representation of potential effects on resources at different river reaches.
The trigger for implementation would be when observed temperatures exceed 15.5 C (60 F) for 3
consecutive days. Currently real time temperature data exists below Glen Canyon Dam and at Lees
Ferry (river mile 0). There are additional gauges at river mile 30 and river mile 61, however these
gages do not provide real time data, but can be downloaded remotely. For locations that do not have
real time temperature data, the best available models would be used to determine trigger timing. The trigger location for the 15.5 C (60 F) threshold could be anywhere upstream of river mile 61, depending on the smallmouth bass distribution and size class, frequency and efficacy of sampling, or other considerations as determined through the planning and implementation process. Smallmouth
bass distribution upstream of river mile 61 would be assessed based on the best available
information and considered in the planning and implementation process, with the understanding
that smallmouth bass sampling is limited below Lees Ferry and can have limited efficacy in assessing
the locations of smaller size fish and of fish located in certain riverine environments where sampling
is difficult. Smallmouth bass distribution upstream of river mile 61 will be assessed based on the best
available information and considered in the planning and implementation process, with the
understanding that smallmouth bass sampling can have limited efficacy in assessing the locations of
smaller size fish and of fish located in certain riverine environments where sampling is difficult. (ROD)
For 2024, based on the likelihood of needing to respond to increasing river temperatures, this ROD
provides guidance for smallmouth bass flow operations. A cool mix would occur when the average daily temperature at river mile 61 exceeds 15.5 C (60 F) for 3 consecutive days. The temperature
data would be determined using real-time stream gage data at the dam and at Lees Ferry and existing
downstream models (such as Dibble et al. 2021). The Cool Mix Alterative would be implemented until the mean daily water temperature (without bypass) falls below 15.5 C (60 F) at river mile 61.
Temperature and biological monitoring would occur throughout this process to assess effectiveness.
Gage data near river mile 61 would be accessed monthly during implementation to confirm
temperature targets are being met. (ROD)
The ROD states that in 2024, “The Cool Mix Alternative would be implemented until the mean daily water temperature (without bypass) falls below 15.5°C (60°F) at river mile 61.” Furthermore, it states that in any given year for each alternative, “The trigger location for the 15.5°C (60°F) threshold could be anywhere upstream of river mile 61, depending on the smallmouth bass distribution and size class, frequency and efficacy of sampling, or other considerations as determined through the planning and implementation process.” (2024 SMB Flow Offramp - Decision Memo)
|
Offramps
|
|
The Cool Mix Alterative would be implemented
until the mean daily water temperature (without bypass) falls below 15.5 C (60 F) at river mile 61. (ROD)
Potential off-ramps would be considered based on monitoring data. Off-ramps will occur if any
unacceptable adverse impacts on the resources listed in Section 1.3 of the 2016 LTEMP ROD's
Attachment B are anticipated. Off-ramps would also occur if the experiments prove to be inefficient
at disrupting smallmouth bass spawning and meeting the purpose and need. (ROD)
The expert panel information was provided to the PI Leadership Team who provided the following recommendation for 2024: “Continue Cool Mix-flow to cool to River Mile 61. Stop Cool Mix flows when Glen Canyon Dam penstocks release water temperatures are observed to be at or below 15.5 and anticipated to remain below that threshold as measured by the sonde (NWIS #09379901) immediately below Glen Canyon Dam.” (2024 SMB Flow Offramp - Decision Memo)
|
|
Links
|
|
|
Temperature Gages
|
|
|
Documents
|
|
|
Presentations and Papers
|
|
2026
2025
2024
2023
|
Areas where Cool Mix does not work
|
|
Cool Mix does not prevent entrainment of smallmouth bass through Glen Canyon Dam and it does not cool spawning and nursery habitats that are disconnected from the mainstem (e.g. the Dam Slough at -15 mile). Fish can and will migrate from the tailwater downstream into Grand Canyon and into areas where temperature control at Glen Canyon Dam cannot reach. If habitat in Grand Canyon is in fact suitable for smallmouth bass establishment (see the Pine et al. 2025 - Yackulic et al. 2026 discussion on the Smallmouth Bass Page), continued entrainment of juvenile and adult smallmouth bass and the availability of spawning and nursery habitat like the Dam Slough at -15 mile poses similar risks to humpback chub as allowing warmwater releases from Glen Canyon Dam.
Eppehimer et al. (2025) found that maintaining Lake Powell elevations above 3590 ft (1094 m) would likely minimize propagule pressure from the reservoir and create downstream conditions that minimize smallmouth bass population growth. Smallmouth bass propagule pressure increases dramatically as reservoir elevation declines below 3530 ft (1076 m). Breton et al. (2015) found that eliminating entrainment from source reservoirs was the only way to reduce smallmouth bass populations to zero in Little Yampa Canyon.
The Rapid Response Tech Team reported on 4/22/26 that bluegill and green sunfish had recently spawned in the Dam Slough at river mile -15. Minimum spawning temperatures for bluegill and green sunfish are 17 C and 19 C, respectively. Releases from Glen Canyon Dam during this period were between 10 and 11 C. This shows the ineffectiveness of Cool Mix at cooling spawning and nursery habitats that are exposed to solar heating and isolated from the river and the need to modify these habitats in order to keep them from becoming source areas for invasive fish.
Downstream movement of smallmouth bass
Hawkins et al. (2009) found that smallmouth bass in the Yampa River moved long distances both upstream and downstream within short timeframes. They found this high mobility contributes to rapid basin-wide dispersal and complicates nonnative predator suppression efforts aimed at protecting native endangered fish.
|
|