Difference between revisions of "'''Oviposition and Egg Desiccation'''"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 43: Line 43:
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
[[File:EPThydropeakingModel.jpg|600px]]
+
[[File:EPThydropeakingModel.jpg|thumb|center|400px| [http://gcdamp.com/images_gcdamp_com/7/70/Kennedy_2016_HydropowerEPT.pdf BioScience Paper] ]]
[[File:MidgeAbundanceFlow.jpg|400px]]
+
[[File:MidgeAbundanceFlow.jpg|thumb|center|400px| [http://gcdamp.com/images_gcdamp_com/7/70/Kennedy_2016_HydropowerEPT.pdf BioScience Paper] ]]
[[File:DesiccationMortality.jpg|400px]]
+
[[File:DesiccationMortality.jpg|thumb|center|400px| [http://gcdamp.com/images_gcdamp_com/7/70/Kennedy_2016_HydropowerEPT.pdf BioScience Paper] ]]
[[File:EPTdiversityHydropeaking.jpg|600px]] <br>
+
[[File:EPTdiversityHydropeaking.jpg|thumb|center|400px| [http://gcdamp.com/images_gcdamp_com/7/70/Kennedy_2016_HydropowerEPT.pdf BioScience Paper] ]]
 +
[[File:MidgeEggStranding.jpg|thumb|center|600px|https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/17jan26/AR19_Kennedy.pdf]]  
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 15:06, 15 March 2018


MacroinvertEggmasses.jpg

Oviposition and Egg Desiccation Studies below Flaming Gorge and Glen Canyon Dams

Kennedy's 2016 Bioscience paper presents a conceptual model describing how hydropower flows could be limiting aquatic insect diversity and production by limiting the reproductive success of insects accustom to laying their eggs along the shoreline. It provides supporting data from an egg desiccation study done below Flaming Gorge Dam, light trap data collected in the Grand Canyon, and a comparison of fluctuation intensity and EPT diversity in several western US hydropower tailwaters. The paper concludes that egg desiccation from fluctuating flows is likely a leading factor in limiting aquatic insect diversity and production in tailwaters below hydropower facilities. The paper also proposes a bugflow experiment to be tested at Glen Canyon Dam as a possible mitigation for fluctuating flows made for hydropower production.

--
--
--

Updates


Links and Information

Papers and Presentations

2016

Other Stuff

P1020356.JPG

  • Caddis hatch below Parker Dam. There are several species of EPT below Parker and Davis Dam in spite of daily fluctuations that exceed 6 feet per day.

At least three genera of caddisflies and one genus of mayfly were collected in drift and benthic samples downstream of Davis and Parker Dams. These are species of a net-spinning caddisfly in the family Hydropsychidae (Smicridea), a case-building caddisfly in the family Leptoceridae (Nectopsyche), microcaddisflies in the family Hydroptilidae, and a swimming mayfly in the family Baetidae (Baetis). Hydroptilidae are found in light trap samples downstream of Lees Ferry in Grand Canyon, and are common in Arizona streans and rivers (Blinn and Ruiter, 2009). They are nonetheless very small (as indicated by its common name): at under 5 mm in total length (Merritt and others, 2008), generally smaller even than midge (Chironomidae) larvae, and therefore not a valuable prey item for fish. The genus Smicridea spins silk nets for capturing floating particles or organic matter suspended in the water column. For this reason, its family, in general, is common in tailwaters, where they can achieve great densities (Nakano and Strayer, 2014). In fact, Smicridea specifically is a documented pest species in the Parker Dam tailwater and in the Central Arizona Project canals carrying water to the Phoenix metropolitan area (D. Ruiter, personal communication). Baetis mayflies are one of the more common genera in aquatic ecosystems (Merritt and others, 2008); like midges, they are virtually ubiquitous in freshwater habitats. Relatively less information is currently available about the Nectopsyche caddisflies found in these sites, pending further literature research. (2016 GCMRC trip summary to WAPA)