Difference between revisions of "Science Advisors"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | *'''[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16jan26/documents/Attach_07.pdf | + | *'''[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16jan26/documents/Attach_07.pdf GCDAMP: Science Advisors-Executive Coordinator Program Work Plan for FY16] |
*'''[[Media:Gcmrc roles amp.pdf |GCMRC-USGS role in the GCDAMP]] | *'''[[Media:Gcmrc roles amp.pdf |GCMRC-USGS role in the GCDAMP]] | ||
*'''[[Media:2000-03-31 DOI GCMRC- Institutional Home 00mar31.PDF |2000-03-31 DOI Memo: GCMRC- Institutional Home]] | *'''[[Media:2000-03-31 DOI GCMRC- Institutional Home 00mar31.PDF |2000-03-31 DOI Memo: GCMRC- Institutional Home]] | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 4 March 2016
SCIENCE TRIPS
- GCDAMP: Science Advisors-Executive Coordinator Program Work Plan for FY16
- GCMRC-USGS role in the GCDAMP
- 2000-03-31 DOI Memo: GCMRC- Institutional Home
- FROM: Anne Castle
- DATE: March 31, 2011
- RE: "GCMRC Science Planning"
- "Our first and foremost priority is complance with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the humpback chub.
- "Second, we need to focus on sediment, which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..."
- "Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both non-native fish control and the recreational trout fishery.
- "These are the primary areas where I have asked GCMRC to concentrate its resources."
Under Construction
Under Construction- Try back later
- "We need a science that empowers decision makers to develop a comprehensive vision of how a future Colorado River can function."
- "We have the ability to recreate any kind of a river we want. We just have to decide what we want and where we want it, and to decide if we want to pay for it.(JSchmit_SDM-workshop_Aug 2013)
