Difference between revisions of "FOOD BASE"
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
'''2016''' | '''2016''' | ||
− | *[http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2016/3053/fs20163053.pdf Voichick | + | *[http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2016/3053/fs20163053.pdf Voichick et al. 2016. Water clarity of the Colorado River—Implications for food webs and fish communities: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2016–3053, 4 p.] |
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/16aug24/Attach_11b.pdf Aquatic Foodbase of the Little Colorado River] | *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/16aug24/Attach_11b.pdf Aquatic Foodbase of the Little Colorado River] | ||
*[[Media:Kennedy 2016 HydropowerEPT.pdf| Kennedy et al. 2016. Flow Management for Hydropower Extirpates Aquatic Insects, Undermining River Food Webs. BioScience]] | *[[Media:Kennedy 2016 HydropowerEPT.pdf| Kennedy et al. 2016. Flow Management for Hydropower Extirpates Aquatic Insects, Undermining River Food Webs. BioScience]] | ||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
'''2014''' | '''2014''' | ||
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/index.html Citizen Science Insect Monitoring: A Powerful Tool for Detecting Ecosystem Change] | *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/index.html Citizen Science Insect Monitoring: A Powerful Tool for Detecting Ecosystem Change] | ||
− | *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/Attach_04a.pdf| | + | *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/14aug27/Attach_04a.pdf| Science Updates - Recent Research on Sand, Bugs, and Fish ] |
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/Attach_05a.pdf Foodbase Enhancement Suggestions from Federation of Fly Fishers] | *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/Attach_05a.pdf Foodbase Enhancement Suggestions from Federation of Fly Fishers] | ||
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/Attach_05b.pdf Foodbase Findings] | *[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/Attach_05b.pdf Foodbase Findings] | ||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
*[http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2013/3039/fs2013-3039.pdf USGS fact sheet: Native and nonnative fish populations of the Colorado River are food limited - Evidence from new food web analyses] | *[http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2013/3039/fs2013-3039.pdf USGS fact sheet: Native and nonnative fish populations of the Colorado River are food limited - Evidence from new food web analyses] | ||
*[http://www.gcmrc.gov/about/foodbase/WellardKelley_et%20al.%202013.pdf Macroinvertebrate diets reflect tributary inputs and turbidity-driven changes in food availability in the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam] | *[http://www.gcmrc.gov/about/foodbase/WellardKelley_et%20al.%202013.pdf Macroinvertebrate diets reflect tributary inputs and turbidity-driven changes in food availability in the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam] | ||
− | *[http://www.gcmrc.gov/about/foodbase/Kennedy%20et%20al.%20FWB%20proofs.pdf Kennedy et al. 2013 | + | *[http://www.gcmrc.gov/about/foodbase/Kennedy%20et%20al.%20FWB%20proofs.pdf Kennedy et al. 2013. The relation between invertebrate drift and two primary controls, discharge and benthic densities, in a large regulated river] |
'''2012''' | '''2012''' |
Revision as of 09:03, 3 November 2016
|
The Aquatic Food Base below Glen Canyon DamThe Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam has been altered by dam-induced modifications to the river’s flow, temperature, and sediment supply. Nonnative species have also changed the natural system. Nonnative fish are thought to prey on and compete with native fish, including the endangered humpback chub (Gila cypha). These impacts have likely changed both the amount and sources of energy that fuel the aquatic food web and the flows of energy within the food web. Installation of the dam created a relatively clear, cool aquatic environment below the dam that now allows aquatic plants to capture the sun’s energy, and they in turn are now consumed by a few species, including scuds (Gammarus lacustris), midges (Family: Chironomidae), blackflies (Simulium arcticum), and New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). The first three species can provide food for both native and nonnative fishes, but fish cannot digest the New Zealand mudsnail. Desired Future Condition for the Aquatic Food BaseThe aquatic food base will sustainably support viable populations of desired species at all trophic levels. Assure that an adequate, diverse, productive aquatic foodbase exists for fish and other aquatic and terrestrial species that depend on those food resources. |
--- |
|
--- |
---|
|
|