Difference between revisions of "Aeolian Sand Transport"

Revision as of 18:33, 6 December 2016

---	---	---

Collin et al. 2016:

Aeolian deposition was found at 4 sites (30%) where partial infilling occurred preventing further erosion.
“Despite this promise for archaeological site preservation, our observations show that gully annealing can only occur under a specific set of conditions related to fluvial sand availability and wind transport direction.”

Links
Sediment Page
Presentations and Papers
2016 Collins et al. 2016. Relations between rainfall–runoff-induced erosion and aeolian deposition at archaeological sites in a semi-arid dam-controlled river corridor, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms East et. al. 2016. Conditions and processes affecting sand resources at archeological sites in the Colorado River corridor below Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 2014 Gully annealing by Aeolian sediment: Field and remote-sensing investigation in Glen, Marble, and Grand Canyons (Sankey)
Other Stuff

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 |style="color:#000;"|
-Collin et al. 2016: Aeolian deposition was found at 4 sites (30%) where partial infilling occurred preventing further erosion. “Despite this promise for archaeological site preservation, our observations show that gully annealing can only occur under a specific set of conditions related to fluvial sand availability and wind transport direction.”
+'''Collin et al. 2016:'''
+*Aeolian deposition was found at 4 sites (30%) where partial infilling occurred preventing further erosion.
+*“Despite this promise for archaeological site preservation, our observations show that gully annealing can only occur under a specific set of conditions related to fluvial sand availability and wind transport direction.”
 |}