Difference between revisions of "SEIS Bypass Releases"
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cool Mix Alternative (Preferred Alternative) === | ||
+ | The Cool Mix Alternative aims to maintain a daily average water temperature below 15.5 degrees | ||
+ | Celsius (C) (60 degrees Fahrenheit [F]) at the target river mile locations below Glen Canyon Dam | ||
+ | where smallmouth bass could spawn. It would involve strategic water releases from both the | ||
+ | penstocks and river outlet works, with quantities determined by predicted temperatures. Flows | ||
+ | would be triggered when temperatures rise above 15.5C (60F), with variations based on monthly | ||
+ | water volumes and conditions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cool Mix with Flow Spike Alternative === | ||
+ | The Cool Mix with Flow Spike Alternative would maintain daily average water temperatures below | ||
+ | 15.5C (60F) at the target river mile locations below Glen Canyon Dam. It would include up to | ||
+ | three 8-hour flow spikes, with a maximum flow of up to 45,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), to | ||
+ | disrupt spawning in margin habitats. HFE releases could replace flow spikes to maximize sediment | ||
+ | benefits. Water releases would vary monthly based on predicted temperatures. Flow spikes and HFE | ||
+ | releases would be similar but triggered differently. During a flow spike, peak discharge would be up | ||
+ | to 32,000 cfs, moving about 133,000 acre-feet of water over 3 days. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cold Shock Alternative === | ||
+ | The Cold Shock Alternative aims to induce short-duration cold shocks, lowering temperatures to | ||
+ | 130C (55.4F) at the target river mile locations below Glen Canyon Dam to disrupt smallmouth bass | ||
+ | spawning and rearing. Flows would be activated when temperatures rise above 15.50 (60 F), with | ||
+ | cold shocks potentially occurring every weekend for up to 12 weekends, lasting 48 hours each. The | ||
+ | goal would be to achieve rapid and sustained cooling of the river to disrupt spawning behavior. | ||
+ | Actual release capacities may vary slightly based on operational constraints, and hydropower releases | ||
+ | are assumed to be 2,000 cfs. Extreme high-temperature scenarios may limit reaching the target | ||
+ | temperatures. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cold Shock with Flow Spike Alternative=== | ||
+ | The Cold Shock with Flow Spike Alternative would involve releasing water through the river outlet | ||
+ | works for 48 hours to induce a cold shock downstream to the targeted river mile. Up to three 8- | ||
+ | hour flow spikes may also be implemented if enough water is available to disrupt spawning in | ||
+ | warmer margin habitats. The release quantity would be based on predicted temperatures and | ||
+ | operational constraints, which would vary' throughout the year. This alternative would start when | ||
+ | daily water temperatures at the Little Colorado River reach 15.5C (60F), with weekly 48-hour cold- | ||
+ | shock releases and at least one 8-hour flow spike, lasting up to 12 weeks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Non-Bypass Alternative === | ||
+ | The Non-Bypass Alternative would involve strategic river stage changes along the Lees Ferry reach | ||
+ | to disrupt smallmouth bass nests and spawning activities below Glen Canyon Dam. It would include | ||
+ | a once-weekly, short-duration, low-flow release followed by a short-duration, high-flow release. The | ||
+ | low-flow release would target shallow nesting areas, while the high-flow release would increase water | ||
+ | velocities in deeper habitats. These releases would be designed to attenuate by the time they reach | ||
+ | the Little Colorado River confluence. Flows would start on Sunday nights, peak on Monday | ||
+ | morning, and return to normal by Monday afternoon. The treatment would be repeated weekly | ||
+ | based on water temperature projections. This alternative aims to disrupt spawning at river mile 61, | ||
+ | with adjustments possible during implementation. | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 59: | Line 106: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
+ | |||
+ | Potential off-ramps would be considered based on monitoring data. Off-ramps will occur if any | ||
+ | unacceptable adverse impacts on the resources listed in Section 1.3 of the 2016 LTEMP ROD's | ||
+ | Attachment B are anticipated. Off-ramps would also occur if the experiments prove to be inefficient | ||
+ | at disrupting smallmouth bass spawning and meeting the purpose and need. [https://www.usbr.gov/uc/DocLibrary/EnvironmentalImpactStatements/GlenCanyonDamLong-TermExperimentalManagementPlan/20240703-GCDLTEMP-FinalSEIS-RecordofDecision-508-AMWD.pdf (ROD) ] | ||
The expert panel information was provided to the PI Leadership Team who provided the following recommendation for 2024: “Continue Cool Mix-flow to cool to River Mile 61. Stop Cool Mix flows when Glen Canyon Dam penstocks release water temperatures are observed to be at or below 15.5 and anticipated to remain below that threshold as measured by the sonde (NWIS #09379901) immediately below Glen Canyon Dam.” [[Media:2024_SMB_Flow_Offramp_-_Decision_Memo.pdf|(2024 SMB Flow Offramp - Decision Memo)]] | The expert panel information was provided to the PI Leadership Team who provided the following recommendation for 2024: “Continue Cool Mix-flow to cool to River Mile 61. Stop Cool Mix flows when Glen Canyon Dam penstocks release water temperatures are observed to be at or below 15.5 and anticipated to remain below that threshold as measured by the sonde (NWIS #09379901) immediately below Glen Canyon Dam.” [[Media:2024_SMB_Flow_Offramp_-_Decision_Memo.pdf|(2024 SMB Flow Offramp - Decision Memo)]] |
Revision as of 14:20, 20 November 2024
|
|
-- |
-- |
-- |
---|
|
|