Difference between revisions of "Science Advisors"
From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | + | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *'''[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16apr19/documents/SA_Charter_OP.pdf GCDAMP Updated Science Advisors Program Charter and Operating Protocols, 2016] | ||
*'''[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16jan26/documents/Attach_07.pdf GCDAMP: Science Advisors-Executive Coordinator Program Work Plan for FY16] | *'''[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/16jan26/documents/Attach_07.pdf GCDAMP: Science Advisors-Executive Coordinator Program Work Plan for FY16] | ||
*'''[[Media:Gcmrc roles amp.pdf |GCMRC-USGS role in the GCDAMP]] | *'''[[Media:Gcmrc roles amp.pdf |GCMRC-USGS role in the GCDAMP]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
*DATE: March 31, 2011 | *DATE: March 31, 2011 | ||
*RE: "GCMRC Science Planning" | *RE: "GCMRC Science Planning" | ||
| − | #"Our first and foremost priority is ''' | + | #"Our first and foremost priority is '''compliance''' with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the '''humpback chub'''. |
#"Second, we need to focus on '''sediment''', which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..." | #"Second, we need to focus on '''sediment''', which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..." | ||
#"Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both '''non-native fish control''' and the '''recreational trout fishery'''.'' | #"Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both '''non-native fish control''' and the '''recreational trout fishery'''.'' | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[SCIENCE LEARNING PAGE| | + | ==[[SCIENCE LEARNING PAGE| Science Learning Page]]== |
*"We need a science that empowers decision makers to develop a comprehensive vision of how a future Colorado River can function." | *"We need a science that empowers decision makers to develop a comprehensive vision of how a future Colorado River can function." | ||
*"We have the ability to recreate any kind of a river we want. We just have to decide what we want and where we want it, and to decide if we want to pay for it.(JSchmit_SDM-workshop_Aug 2013) | *"We have the ability to recreate any kind of a river we want. We just have to decide what we want and where we want it, and to decide if we want to pay for it.(JSchmit_SDM-workshop_Aug 2013) | ||
Revision as of 11:22, 13 May 2016
- GCDAMP Updated Science Advisors Program Charter and Operating Protocols, 2016
- GCDAMP: Science Advisors-Executive Coordinator Program Work Plan for FY16
- GCMRC-USGS role in the GCDAMP
- 2000-03-31 DOI Memo: GCMRC- Institutional Home
- FROM: Anne Castle
- DATE: March 31, 2011
- RE: "GCMRC Science Planning"
- "Our first and foremost priority is compliance with the Endangered Species Act, which means focus on the native fish and particularly the humpback chub.
- "Second, we need to focus on sediment, which was an instigating factor for the Grand Canyon Protection Act and continues to be an issue with resources down stream of the dam..."
- "Third, and these are competing priorities, we need science on both non-native fish control and the recreational trout fishery.
- "These are the primary areas where I have asked GCMRC to concentrate its resources."
Science Learning Page
- "We need a science that empowers decision makers to develop a comprehensive vision of how a future Colorado River can function."
- "We have the ability to recreate any kind of a river we want. We just have to decide what we want and where we want it, and to decide if we want to pay for it.(JSchmit_SDM-workshop_Aug 2013)
