Difference between revisions of "FOOD BASE"
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
Cellsworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
|style="color:#000;"| | |style="color:#000;"| | ||
− | [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=%27%27%27Oviposition_and_Egg_Desiccation%27%27%27 Oviposition and Egg Desiccation] | + | [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=%27%27%27Oviposition_and_Egg_Desiccation%27%27%27 Oviposition and Egg Desiccation Studies] |
− | [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Foodwebs_and_Bioenergetics Foodwebs and Bioenergetics] | + | [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Foodwebs_and_Bioenergetics Foodwebs and Bioenergetics Studies] |
Measuring Primary Production in the Lees Ferry Reach | Measuring Primary Production in the Lees Ferry Reach | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
Downstream Recovery of the Foodbase Community in Several Colorado River Tailwaters | Downstream Recovery of the Foodbase Community in Several Colorado River Tailwaters | ||
− | Drift and Food Availability | + | Drift and Food Availability Studies |
*[http://www.usu.edu/buglab/Projects/CurrentProjects/#item=33 Responses of macroinvertebrate drift, benthic assemblages and trout foraging to hydropeaking] | *[http://www.usu.edu/buglab/Projects/CurrentProjects/#item=33 Responses of macroinvertebrate drift, benthic assemblages and trout foraging to hydropeaking] | ||
Revision as of 15:47, 27 March 2017
|
The Aquatic Food Base below Glen Canyon DamThe Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam has been altered by dam-induced modifications to the river’s flow, temperature, and sediment supply. Nonnative species have also changed the natural system. Nonnative fish are thought to prey on and compete with native fish, including the endangered humpback chub (Gila cypha). These impacts have likely changed both the amount and sources of energy that fuel the aquatic food web and the flows of energy within the food web. Installation of the dam created a relatively clear, cool aquatic environment below the dam that now allows aquatic plants to capture the sun’s energy, and they in turn are now consumed by a few species, including scuds (Gammarus lacustris), midges (Family: Chironomidae), blackflies (Simulium arcticum), and New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). The first three species can provide food for both native and nonnative fishes, but fish cannot digest the New Zealand mudsnail. Desired Future Condition for the Aquatic Food BaseThe aquatic food base will sustainably support viable populations of desired species at all trophic levels. Assure that an adequate, diverse, productive aquatic foodbase exists for fish and other aquatic and terrestrial species that depend on those food resources. |
EPT as Biologic Indicators of Stream Condition |
Algae and Aquatic Macrophytes |
Aquatic Macroinvertebrates |
---|