Difference between revisions of "Portal:GCDAMP DOI Direction"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 133: Line 133:
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10feb03/Attach_02.pdf Secretary's Response to April 2009 and August 2009 AMWG Recommendations]
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10feb03/Attach_02.pdf Secretary's Response to April 2009 and August 2009 AMWG Recommendations]
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10feb03/Attach_06b.pdf Text from Secretary Ken Salazar's Speech to the Colorado River Water Users Association]
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10feb03/Attach_06b.pdf Text from Secretary Ken Salazar's Speech to the Colorado River Water Users Association]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10feb03/Attach_24.pdf Memo from Anne Castle to Secretary Salaza, Subject: Report and Recommendations from the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Federal Advisory Committee Dated March 16, 2010]
  
 
'''1999'''
 
'''1999'''

Revision as of 11:03, 6 July 2018



Budget [1]

  • Reduce time and effort spent on the budget process to allow time for ongoing science efforts
  • Future workplans should target its limited resources to the highest priority projects
  • Balance near- and long-term priorities
  • Maintain flexibility to respond to changing needs
  • Use more conservative budget projections based on recent performance of the Consumer Price Index
  • Identify funding for all work included in the workplan to avoid shortfalls
  • Clarify procedures and justifications in proposing and making mid-course changes to projects

Tribal Engagement [2]

  • The GCDAMP/Science Advisors Program should explore ways to co-produce with Tribes a useful definition of what cultural resources require attention, and what approaches to evaluation will be meaningful.

Science Activities under LTEMP [3]

Science Advisors Program [4]

Documents and Resources

2017

2016

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

1999

---