Difference between revisions of "CULTURAL"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 109: Line 109:
  
 
'''2015'''
 
'''2015'''
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/15jan20/Attach_04.pdf Cultural Site Monitoring in Glen and Grand Canyons]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2015-01-20-twg-meeting/Attach_04.pdf Cultural Site Monitoring in Glen and Grand Canyons]
  
 
'''2014'''
 
'''2014'''
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/Attach_07.pdf Cultural Resources Ad Hoc Group Report ]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2014-01-30-twg-meeting/Attach_07.pdf Cultural Resources Ad Hoc Group Report ]
*[http://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/14jan30/AR_Fairley_Landscape-scale.pdf Landscape-scale management implications of cultural resource studies (Fairley)]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2014-01-30-twg-meeting/AR_Fairley_Landscape-scale.pdf Landscape-scale management implications of cultural resource studies (Fairley)]
  
 
'''2013'''
 
'''2013'''
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/13jan24/Attach_04.pdf Memorandum of Understanding Among the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, U.S Dept. of Energy, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding Interagency Coordination and Collaboration for the Protection of Indian Sacred Sites]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2013-01-24-twg-meeting/Attach_04.pdf Memorandum of Understanding Among the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, U.S Dept. of Energy, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding Interagency Coordination and Collaboration for the Protection of Indian Sacred Sites]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/13jan24/22_Fairley.pdf Summary of 2012 Accomplishments for Cultural Monitoring R&D Project, New Knowledge Gained, and Future Research Directions for FY2013-14]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2013-01-24-twg-meeting/22_Fairley.pdf Summary of 2012 Accomplishments for Cultural Monitoring R&D Project, New Knowledge Gained, and Future Research Directions for FY2013-14]
  
 
'''2012'''
 
'''2012'''
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/12apr16/Attach_06e.pdf Memo from Dr. Joel Pederson to Marianne Crawford Dated Sept. 30, 2011, Subject: Finalized Report Enclosed for Grand Canyon Project, AND Report on Data Recovery at Nine Cultural Sites in Grand Canyon and Glen Canyon 2008-2010]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2012-02-22-amwg-meeting/Attach_12.pdf AIF: Glen Canyon Dam National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Compliance Update]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/12feb22/Attach_12.pdf AIF: Glen Canyon Dam National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Compliance Update]
+
 
*[https://www.gcmrc.gov/about/ka/KA%202%20-%202-1-12/AM%20Talks/Fairley%200845-0930%20Arch%20Site%20Context.pdf Arch Site Context]
 
*[https://www.gcmrc.gov/about/ka/KA%202%20-%202-1-12/AM%20Talks/Fairley%200845-0930%20Arch%20Site%20Context.pdf Arch Site Context]
  
 
'''2011'''
 
'''2011'''
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/11aug24/Attach_07.pdf AIF: National Park Service Colorado River Resource Monitoring and Mitigation Report and PPT]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2011-08-24-amwg-meeting/Attach_07.pdf AIF: National Park Service Colorado River Resource Monitoring and Mitigation Report and PPT]
  
 
'''2010'''
 
'''2010'''
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/10nov15/Attach_11b.pdf Update on the Cultural Monitoring Research and Development Project]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2010-11-15-twg-meeting/Attach_11b.pdf Update on the Cultural Monitoring Research and Development Project]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10aug24/Attach_15d.pdf GCMRC Cultural Program Update]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2010-08-24-amwg-meeting/Attach_15d.pdf GCMRC Cultural Program Update]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/10jun29/Attach_12.pdf “Review of Geoarchaeological Investigation and an Archaeological Treatment Plan for 151 Sites in the Grand Canyon, Arizona” by the GCDAMP Science Advisors dated July 2009]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2010-06-29-twg-meeting/Attach_12.pdf “Review of Geoarchaeological Investigation and an Archaeological Treatment Plan for 151 Sites in the Grand Canyon, Arizona” by the GCDAMP Science Advisors dated July 2009]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/10jun29/Attach_04b.pdf USGS/GCMRC Cultural Program Updates]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2010-06-29-twg-meeting/Attach_04b.pdf USGS/GCMRC Cultural Program Updates]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/10feb03/Attach_10.pdf AIF: Report on Cultural Program and PPT, and DOI-DOE Guidance on Tribal Consultation for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Dated December 16, 2009]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2010-02-03-amwg-meeting/Attach_10.pdf AIF: Report on Cultural Program and PPT, and DOI-DOE Guidance on Tribal Consultation for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Dated December 16, 2009]
  
 
'''2009'''
 
'''2009'''
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09sep29/Attach_09.pdf AIF: Treatment Plan Update and Geoarchaeology Project Update PPT]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-09-29-twg-meeting/Attach_09.pdf AIF: Treatment Plan Update and Geoarchaeology Project Update PPT]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09aug12/Attach_05g.pdf Report on the Cultural Monitoring Research and Development Project PPT]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-08-12-amwg-meeting/Attach_05g.pdf Report on the Cultural Monitoring Research and Development Project PPT]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09jun22/Attach_05b.pdf Letter from Martha Hahn (NPS) dated May 18, 2009, stating NPS "...would not approve FY07-11 Archeological Sites and Development Project"]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-06-22-twg-meeting/Attach_05b.pdf Letter from Martha Hahn (NPS) dated May 18, 2009, stating NPS "...would not approve FY07-11 Archeological Sites and Development Project"]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09jun22/Attach_05a.pdf Report on Current Status and Phase I Results of the Cultural Monitoring R&D Project PPT]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-06-22-twg-meeting/Attach_05a.pdf Report on Current Status and Phase I Results of the Cultural Monitoring R&D Project PPT]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09jun22/Attach_07g.pdf Grand Canyon National Park Cultural Resources Program Annual Budget Estimate for Support of 106 Treatment Program]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-06-22-twg-meeting/Attach_07g.pdf Grand Canyon National Park Cultural Resources Program Annual Budget Estimate for Support of 106 Treatment Program]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_03a.pdf AIF: Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) Update]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_03a.pdf AIF: Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) Update]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_03f.pdf Update on the Cultural Monitoring R&D Project PPT]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_03f.pdf Update on the Cultural Monitoring R&D Project PPT]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_14a.pdf AIF: Archaeological Sites Analysis with HEC-RAS Model]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_14a.pdf AIF: Archaeological Sites Analysis with HEC-RAS Model]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_14b.pdf Analysis of Virtual Shorelines in Relation to Archaeological Sites in the Colorado River Ecosystem PPT]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_14b.pdf Analysis of Virtual Shorelines in Relation to Archaeological Sites in the Colorado River Ecosystem PPT]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_14c.pdf Archaeological Sites Analysis TWG Actions]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/amwg/2009-04-29-amwg-meeting/Attach_14c.pdf Archaeological Sites Analysis TWG Actions]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09mar16/Attach_05.pdf Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center updates by Program Managers]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_05.pdf Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center updates by Program Managers]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09mar16/Attach_12a.pdf AIF: River Stage and Archaeological Sites]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_12a.pdf AIF: River Stage and Archaeological Sites]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09mar16/Attach_12b.pdf An Evaluation of Selected Erosional Factors on Grand Canyon Archaeological Sites (prepared by M. Berry)]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_12b.pdf An Evaluation of Selected Erosional Factors on Grand Canyon Archaeological Sites (prepared by M. Berry)]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09mar16/Attach_12c.pdf Potential of Glen Canyon Releases to Inundate Cultural Sites in Grand Canyon National Park: A GIS Analysis Using Modeled Virtual Shorelines and Canyon-wide Topographic Data PPT (prepared by Hoda Sondossi)]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_12c.pdf Potential of Glen Canyon Releases to Inundate Cultural Sites in Grand Canyon National Park: A GIS Analysis Using Modeled Virtual Shorelines and Canyon-wide Topographic Data PPT (prepared by Hoda Sondossi)]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09mar16/Attach_12f.pdf Geoarchaeological investigations and an archaelogical treatment plan for 151 sites in Grand Canyon, Arizona]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_12f.pdf Geoarchaeological investigations and an archaelogical treatment plan for 151 sites in Grand Canyon, Arizona]
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/twg/mtgs/09mar16/Attach_13.pdf Analysis of Virtual Shorelines in Relation to Archaeological Sites in the Colorado river Ecosystem PPT]
+
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/amp/twg/2009-03-16-twg-meeting/Attach_13.pdf Analysis of Virtual Shorelines in Relation to Archaeological Sites in the Colorado river Ecosystem PPT]
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 11:28, 9 January 2019


300px‎

300px‎

Cultural Resources

The lower reaches of Glen Canyon and the river corridor through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, have been used by humans for at least 13,000 years. Today, at least nine contemporary Native American Tribes claim traditional cultural ties to this area. Grand Canyon National Park contains more than 4,000 documented prehistoric and historic sites, and about 420 of these sites are located in proximity to the Colorado River. The lower reaches of Glen Canyon contain an additional 55 sites.

In addition to archaeological sites, cultural resources along the Colorado River corridor include historic structures and other types of historic properties, as well as biological and physical resources that are of traditional cultural importance to Native American peoples such as springs, unique landforms, mineral deposits, native plant concentrations, and various animal species.

LTEMP Resource Goal for Archaeological and Cultural Resources

Maintain the integrity of potentially affected NRHP-eligible or listed historic properties in place, where possible, with preservation methods employed on a site-specific basis.

Desired Future Condition for Cultural Resources

Prehistoric Archaeological Sites and Historic Sites:
To the extent feasible, maintain significance and integrity through preservation in place.
• If preservation in place is not feasible or reasonable, then implementation of appropriate preservation treatments will be implemented to ensure reduction or elimination of threats consistent with NPS management policies, tribal traditional values and historic preservation law.
• Public access to historic properties on tribal lands is managed by the respective tribes. On lands administered by the NPS, access to some sites for users of the river corridor is maintained as long as integrity of the sites in not compromised.

Tribal Ecological Knowledge
Cultural Resources Library
Tribal Perspectives

Updates

AeolianResults2017.jpg
[1]
AeolianUpdate2017.jpg
[2]
AeolianOptions.jpg
[3]
AeolianTypes.jpg
[4]


Information and Links

Cultural Projects

Questions

Collin et al. 2016:

  • Aeolian deposition was found at 4 of 13 sites (30%) where partial infilling occurred preventing further erosion.
  • “Despite this promise for archaeological site preservation, our observations show that gully annealing can only occur under a specific set of conditions related to fluvial sand availability and wind transport direction.”
  • Does Aeolian sand transport research support the use of anthropogenic sand bar building as a means to provide a source of aeolian sands to preserve and protect archaeological sites?
  • Or would current stabilization measures carried out by the NPS be more likely to be successful, predictable, and immediate at protecting archaeological sites?

Papers and Presentations

2018

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Tribal Monitoring Reports

2017

2016

2015

2014

2012

2011

Other Stuff