Difference between revisions of "Portal:GCDAMP DOI Direction"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 142: Line 142:
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_02c.pdf Memo from Kameran Onley dated 1/16/09, Subj: Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group]
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_02c.pdf Memo from Kameran Onley dated 1/16/09, Subj: Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group]
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_02d.pdf Memo from Kameran Onley dated 1/16/09, Subj: Transition and Farewell]
 
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_02d.pdf Memo from Kameran Onley dated 1/16/09, Subj: Transition and Farewell]
 +
*[https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/amp/amwg/mtgs/09apr29/Attach_18.pdf Concurrence Memo from DOI Secretary Ken Salazar dated March 26, 2009, Subj: Extension of Members of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group [through Sept. 30, 2009]]
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 15:12, 9 July 2018



Budget [1]

  • Reduce time and effort spent on the budget process to allow time for ongoing science efforts
  • Future workplans should target its limited resources to the highest priority projects
  • Balance near- and long-term priorities
  • Maintain flexibility to respond to changing needs
  • Use more conservative budget projections based on recent performance of the Consumer Price Index
  • Identify funding for all work included in the workplan to avoid shortfalls
  • Clarify procedures and justifications in proposing and making mid-course changes to projects

Tribal Engagement [2]

  • The GCDAMP/Science Advisors Program should explore ways to co-produce with Tribes a useful definition of what cultural resources require attention, and what approaches to evaluation will be meaningful.

Science Activities under LTEMP [3]

Science Advisors Program [4]

Documents and Resources

2017

2016

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

1999

---