Difference between revisions of "Portal:GCDAMP DOI Direction"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 55: Line 55:
 
*The responsible development and production of renewable energy on federal lands, i.e. the GCDAMP is encouraged to work within the LTEMP framework to seek ways to improve the value of the hydropower resource.  
 
*The responsible development and production of renewable energy on federal lands, i.e. the GCDAMP is encouraged to work within the LTEMP framework to seek ways to improve the value of the hydropower resource.  
  
=== Updating Guidance Documents ===
+
=== Update Guidance Documents ===
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Strategic_Plan Strategic Plan]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Strategic_Plan Strategic Plan]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Planning Vision]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Planning Vision]

Revision as of 13:13, 29 August 2019



Latest direction from DOI:

Guidance from Tim Petty for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program dated August 14, 2019

LTEMP Implementation

Priorities:

  • Management and Experimental Actions
  • Mitigation and Environmental Commitments
  • Research and Monitoring
  • The responsible development and production of renewable energy on federal lands, i.e. the GCDAMP is encouraged to work within the LTEMP framework to seek ways to improve the value of the hydropower resource.

Update Guidance Documents

TWP and budget should focus on compliance priorities including:

  • Maintaining dam releases consistent with applicable laws
  • Activities associated with the Endangered Species Act
  • Actions necessary for compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act
  • Research and monitoring as required by the Grand Canyon Protection Act

The GCDAMP and AMWG guidance should consider any implications brought on by the:

  • Drought Contingency Planning
  • New negotiations of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead

LTEMP Scientific Monitoring Plan

  • Conduct review every three years (with the start of each TWP)

Develop and implement monitoring metrics for the resource goals and objectives defined in the LTEMP ROD

  • Interior directs AMWG to develop recommendations for the monitoring metrics

Future research:

Operating Criteria and Operational Flexibility

  • Continue to utilize operational flexibility in response to varying hydrological and other resource-related conditions
  • Explore the feasibility of conducting a spring HFE, along with modeling for improvements and efficiencies that benefit natural, cultural, recreational, and hydropower resources
  • Starting point: consider opportunities to conduct higher spring releases within power plant capacity, along with spring HFEs that may be triggered under the current LTEMP Protocol

Memo from Jennifer Gimbel on GCDAMP continuity and strategic direction dated July 8, 2016

Budget [1]

  • Reduce time and effort spent on the budget process to allow time for ongoing science efforts
  • Future workplans should target its limited resources to the highest priority projects
  • Balance near- and long-term priorities
  • Maintain flexibility to respond to changing needs
  • Use more conservative budget projections based on recent performance of the Consumer Price Index
  • Identify funding for all work included in the workplan to avoid shortfalls
  • Clarify procedures and justifications in proposing and making mid-course changes to projects

Tribal Engagement [2]

  • The GCDAMP/Science Advisors Program should explore ways to co-produce with Tribes a useful definition of what cultural resources require attention, and what approaches to evaluation will be meaningful.

Science Activities under LTEMP [3]

Science Advisors Program [4]

Documents and Resources

2019

2017

2016

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

1999

Other Stuff