GCDAMP Budget

GCDAMP Budget and Work Plan The goal of the Triennial Budget and Workplan (TWP) is to reduce the effort expended on the budget process while improving the effectiveness of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC), Technical Work Group (TWG), and AMWG. The GCDAMP will develop a TWP the first year of the process. Then, in the second year the GCDAMP would implement the year-two budget and make relatively minor corrections primarily related to changes in CPI and needs at GCMRC and the Bureau of Reclamation. In the third year the GCDAMP would consider minor changes to the year three budget to allow for changes in projects or potential important new starts not envisioned during the development of the triennial budget. The major components of the TWP would include: Three-year budget spreadsheets, work plans, and hydrographs, Modifications of the year-three budget based on specific criteria, Fiscal reporting, including expenditures for the previous fiscal year (mid-year and end end-of year reports), Project progress reports, including an annual reporting meeting in January, and Utilization of the Budget Ad Hoc Group (BAHG) to interface with Reclamation and GCMRC in developing a draft TWP, and to help the TWG develop budget recommendations for AMWG consideration.

GCDAMP Strategic Plan The GCDAMP Strategic Plan (AMPSP) is a long-term plan drafted in August 2001 by GCDAMP and GCMRC participants that identifies the AMWG’s vision, mission, principles, goals, management objectives, information needs, and management actions.	LTEMP Science Plan The LTEMP Science Plan describe a strategy by which monitoring and research data in the natural and social sciences will be collected, analyzed, and provided to DOI, its bureaus, and to the GCDAMP in support of implementation of LTEMP.	Core Monitoring Plan The GCMRC Core Monitoring Plan (CMP) describes the consistent, long-term, repeated measurements using scientifically accepted protocols to measure status and trends of key resources to answer specific questions. Core monitoring is implemented on a fixed schedule regardless of budget or other circumstances (for example, water year, experimental flows, temperature control, stocking strategy, nonnative control, etc.) affecting target resources.	Monitoring and Research Plan The GCMRC Monitoring and Research Plan (MRP) specifies (1) core monitoring activities, (2) research and development activities, and (3) long-term experimental activities consistent with the strategies and priorities established in this SSP to be conducted over the next 5 years to address some of the strategic science questions associated with AMWG priority questions.	Budget and Work Plan The GCMRC Triennial Work Plan (TWP) identifies the scope, objectives, and budget for monitoring and research activities planned for a 3-year period. When completed, the TWP will be consistent with the MRP.

FY21-23 Triennial Budget and Workplan Triennial Budget and Work Plan -- Fiscal Years 2021-2023 GCMRC FY21 Annual Project Report FY18-20 Triennial Budget and Workplan Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Triennial Budget and Work Plan— Fiscal Years 2018–2020, Final AMWG Draft: September 11, 2017 Summary Report of the Peer Review for the 2020 Annual Project Report GCMRC FY20 Annual Project Report GCMRC FY19 Annual Project Report GCMRC FY18 Annual Project Report FY15-17 Triennial Budget and Workplan Triennial Budget and Work Plan -- Fiscal Years 2015-2017 GCMRC FY 2017 Annual Project Report GCMRC FY 2016 Annual Project Report GCMRC FY 2015 Annual Project Report FY13-14 Biannual Budget and Workplan GCDAMP Biennial Budget and Work Plan--Fiscal Years 2013-14 GCMRC Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Project Report to the GCDAMP FY11-12 GCMRC Biannual Budget and Workplan Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Biennial Budget and Work Plan - Fiscal Years 2011-12 Appendix E, FY2011-12 Spreadsheet GCMRC Proposed Budget PPT John Hamill Memo Including Project Summary Table FY10 GCMRC Budget and Workplan BAHG FY2010 Preliminary Budget Recommendation to the TWG dated March 6, 2009 FY2010 Mid-year Expenditures: 1) FY2010 Bureau of Reclamation Mid-year Expenditures and FY2010 GCMRC Mid-year Expenditures Process and Approximate Schedule for FY10-11 Recovery Program Work Planning FY09 GCMRC Budget and Workplan AIF: FY2009 Final Expenditures and USBR Report FY2009 Expenditures for USGS FY08 GCMRC Budget and Workplan

Links Budget AdHoc Group Page 2019 Knowledge Assessment 2017 Knowledge Assessment GCDAMP Planning Page DOI Direction GCDAMP and NPS River Trips and Field Activities Grand Canyon Protection Act Documents and Direction Presentation given by Rod Smith on AMP funding considerations to the AMWG 2017-01-26 GCDAMP Triennial Budget and Workplan Protocol Paper (10-6-2016) GCDAMP Triennial Budget and Workplan Protocol Table 1 update (3-6-2019) Science Questions and Information Needs 2004 GCDAMP Goals and AMWG Priority Questions Papers and Presentation 2022 GCDAMP Triennial Budget and Work Plan Process Reclamation Budget Process 2016 GCDAMP Triennial Budget and Work Plan Process Updated October 19, 2016 Triennial Work Plan Budget Process Technical Work Group (TWG) Report: Triennial Budget Process Development 2011 Biennial Budget Process Paper Budget Concerns Developed by TWG Chair 2010 GCDAMP Biennial Budget Process Paper Approved by the AMWG on May 6, 2010 TWG Biennial Process Paper GCDAMP Biennial Process Paper Approved by the AMWG on May 6, 2010 GCDAMP Biennial Budget Process Paper 2009 AIF: Biennial Budget Process Development with Biennial Budget Process, Draft Outline for TWG Review Memo from Dennis Kuby dated 6/21/09, Subj: Proposed Biennial Budget and Work Plan to Support the GCDAMP in Fiscal Years FY2010-22 Budget Motion and Proposed Amendments GCMRC Response to Budget Motions from the AMWG Meeting held April 29-30, 2009 Biennial Budget Process Discussion Paper Budget Discussion Procedures Funding the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program PUBLIC LAW 106–377—APPENDIX B 114 STAT. 1441A–68-69: "The Cap Language" SEC. 204. (a) IN GENERAL. For fiscal year 2001 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior shall continue funding, from power revenues, the activities of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program as authorized by section 1807 of the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4672), at not more than $7,850,000 (October 2000 price level), adjusted in subsequent years to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor. (b) VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS. Nothing in this section precludes the use of voluntary financial contributions (except power revenues) to the Adaptive Management Program that may be authorized by law. (c) ACTIVITIES TO BE FUNDED. The activities to be funded as provided under subsection (a) include activities required to meet the requirements of section 1802(a) and subsections (a) and (b) of section 1805 of the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4672), including the requirements of the Biological Opinion on the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam and activities required by the Programmatic Agreement on Cultural and Historic Properties, to the extent that the requirements and activities are consistent with the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4672). (d) ADDITIONAL FUNDING. To the extent that funding under subsection (a) is insufficient to pay the costs of the monitoring and research and other activities of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program, the Secretary of the Interior may use funding from other sources, including funds appropriated for that purpose. All such appropriated funds shall be nonreimbursable and nonreturnable. Experimental Fund In 2003, the GCDAMP established a fund to pay for experimental research projects so that they can be conducted without financially impacting other aspects of the science program. The current balance of the experimental fund at the end of the FY2007 is anticipated to be approximately $900,000. An additional $500,000 will be set aside by the GCMRC annually in an account at Reclamation to fund the BHBF tests and other research related to experimental efforts. Deposits to the experimental account will cease when the balance reaches $2.5 million.Monitoring and Research Plan, page 8 If the funds allocated to the Experimental Management Fund are not needed in a given year, at the end of the year, they will be transferred to the Native Fish Conservation Contingency Fund (Reclamation project C.6); some year-end experimental management funds may also be allocated to the Contingency Fund for NHPA Section 106 Compliance (Reclamation project D.10). [1] GCDAMP Status of Experimental Funds FY2008-12 GCDAMP Status of Experimental Funds - FY2008-12 Native Fish Conservation Contingency Fund “The goal of this budget item is to ensure that funds are available for native fish conservation actions or nonnative fish control the event this conservation action is needed for endangered humpback chub…”[2] Projected balance at end of FY 17: ~$1,400,000 [3] New USGS Flagstaff Science Building and Overhead Projection Occupancy agreement between USGS, City of Flagstaff, and GSA signed in April 2019 Occupancy start of FY2021 at earliest, overhead may increase some during planning and construction FY2020 overhead on GCDAMP funds: Current projection ~16%, pass-through rate = 3.0% Overhead on GCDAMP funds to ~26% upon occupancy [4]