Difference between revisions of "FY25-27 Triennial Budget and Workplan Page"

From Glen Canyon Dam AMP
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 76: Line 76:
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Budget GCDAMP Budget and Workplan Page]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_Budget GCDAMP Budget and Workplan Page]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_BAHG_Page Budget AdHoc Group Page]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_BAHG_Page Budget AdHoc Group Page]
 +
 +
|-
 +
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Triennial Budget and Work Plan Motions </h2>
 +
|-
 +
|style="color:#000;"|
 +
 +
 +
|-
 +
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Papers and Presentations</h2>
 +
|-
 +
|style="color:#000;"|
 +
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 92: Line 104:
 
*[[Media:Budget_comparison_to_FY25-27.xlsx|Budget comparison to FY25-27]]
 
*[[Media:Budget_comparison_to_FY25-27.xlsx|Budget comparison to FY25-27]]
 
*[[Media:Proposed_Initial_Paring_Down_of_FY25-27_TWP_Budget_20240423.xlsx|Proposed Initial Paring Down of FY25-27 TWP Budget]]
 
*[[Media:Proposed_Initial_Paring_Down_of_FY25-27_TWP_Budget_20240423.xlsx|Proposed Initial Paring Down of FY25-27 TWP Budget]]
 +
*[[Media:25-27TWP_unfunded_element_costs.xlsx|FY25-27 TWP unfunded element costs]]
  
 +
|-
 +
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Project Summaries for BAHG </h2>
 +
|-
 +
|style="color:#000;"|
  
 
*[[Media:Project_A_change_(read-only).xlsx|Project A]]
 
*[[Media:Project_A_change_(read-only).xlsx|Project A]]
Line 102: Line 119:
 
*[[Media:Project_I_BAHG_call_April25.pdf|Project I]]
 
*[[Media:Project_I_BAHG_call_April25.pdf|Project I]]
 
*[[Media:Project_N.pdf|Project N]]
 
*[[Media:Project_N.pdf|Project N]]
*[[Media:FY25-27_TWP_Compliance.xlsx|FY25-27 TWP Compliance]]
 
 
*[[Media:Bureau_of_Reclamation_2025-2027_Project_Briefs.docx|Reclamation Project Briefs]]
 
*[[Media:Bureau_of_Reclamation_2025-2027_Project_Briefs.docx|Reclamation Project Briefs]]
 +
*[[Media:FY25-27_TWP_Compliance.xlsx|FY25-27 TWP Compliance]]
  
 +
|-
 +
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Science Advisors TWP Review </h2>
 +
|-
 +
|style="color:#000;"|
  
 
*[[Media:TWP_FY21-23_SA_Review.pdf|FY21-23 TWP Science Advisors Review]]
 
*[[Media:TWP_FY21-23_SA_Review.pdf|FY21-23 TWP Science Advisors Review]]
Line 112: Line 133:
 
*[[Media:Independent_Science_Review_Process.pdf|Independent Science Review Process]]
 
*[[Media:Independent_Science_Review_Process.pdf|Independent Science Review Process]]
  
 +
|-
 +
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Stakeholder Prioritization Survey </h2>
 +
|-
 +
|style="color:#000;"|
  
 
*[[Media:Survey_Evaluation.docx|Survey Evaluation]]
 
*[[Media:Survey_Evaluation.docx|Survey Evaluation]]
 
*[[Media:Detailed_Survey_Evaluation.docx|Detailed Survey Evaluation]]
 
*[[Media:Detailed_Survey_Evaluation.docx|Detailed Survey Evaluation]]
 
*[[Media:Detailed_Project_Evaluation.docx|Detailed Project Evaluation]]
 
*[[Media:Detailed_Project_Evaluation.docx|Detailed Project Evaluation]]
 +
*[[Media:BAHG_2025-2027_Triennial_Work_Plan_Priorities.pdf|FY25-27 TWP BAHG Priorities]]
 
*[[Media:FY25-27_TWP_BAHG_Priorities_(Responses)_(1)_heatmap.xlsx|FY25-27 TWP BAHG Priorities (Responses) with heatmap]]
 
*[[Media:FY25-27_TWP_BAHG_Priorities_(Responses)_(1)_heatmap.xlsx|FY25-27 TWP BAHG Priorities (Responses) with heatmap]]
 
*[[Media:FY25-27_Initial_Draf_TWP_Stakeholder_Priorities_Response_Charts.pdf|FY25-27 Initial Draft TWP Stakeholder Priorities Response Charts]]
 
*[[Media:FY25-27_Initial_Draf_TWP_Stakeholder_Priorities_Response_Charts.pdf|FY25-27 Initial Draft TWP Stakeholder Priorities Response Charts]]
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 125: Line 150:
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
 +
*[[Media:20240125_FY25_27_BAHG_Timeline_Slide.pdf|FY25-27 BAHG Timeline Slide ]]
 +
*[[Media:BAHG_101_Agenda.pdf|BAHG 101]]
 +
*[[Media:20231211_FY25_27_BAHG101.pdf|BAHG 101]]
 
*[[Media:Call_1_Notes.docx|Call #1 Notes]]
 
*[[Media:Call_1_Notes.docx|Call #1 Notes]]
 
*[[Media:BAHG_Call_2_Notes.docx|Call #2 Notes]]
 
*[[Media:BAHG_Call_2_Notes.docx|Call #2 Notes]]
Line 143: Line 171:
  
 
|-
 
|-
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Papers and Presentations</h2>
+
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> LTEMP Resource Pages </h2>
|-
+
|style="color:#000;"|
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
|-
+
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Triennial Budget and Work Plan Process </h2>
+
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
== '''Resource Topics ''' ==
 
 
[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP) Based on ROD Resource Categories] (see page 6 of the [http://ltempeis.anl.gov/documents/docs/LTEMP_ROD.pdf ROD])
 
[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP) Based on ROD Resource Categories] (see page 6 of the [http://ltempeis.anl.gov/documents/docs/LTEMP_ROD.pdf ROD])
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=CULTURAL Archaeological and Cultural Resources]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=CULTURAL Archaeological and Cultural Resources]
Line 169: Line 189:
  
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=ECOSYSTEM Natural Processes]: Not used (is an evaluation of above resources as related to “natural” benchmarks)
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=ECOSYSTEM Natural Processes]: Not used (is an evaluation of above resources as related to “natural” benchmarks)
 
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> LTEMP BiOp Conservation Measures [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP)] (2016) </h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
 
== [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub] ==
 
 
Ongoing actions:
 
 
*Translocations of humpback chub into tributaries of the Colorado River in Marble and Grand Canyons
 
*Spring and fall humpback chub population estimate
 
*Control or removal of nonnative fish in tributaries prior to chub translocations
 
*Humpback chub refuge population at a federal hatchery
 
*Ensure that a stable or upward trend of humpback chub mainstem aggregations can be achieved by:
 
#Annual monitoring of the Little Colorado River humpback chub aggregation (e.g., juvenile chub monitoring parameters).
 
#Annual monitoring in the mainstem Colorado River to determine status and trends of humpback chub.
 
#Periodic surveys to identify additional aggregations and individual humpback chub.
 
#Evaluate existing aggregations and determining drivers of these aggregations.
 
#Explore means of expanding humpback chub populations outside of the Little Colorado River Inflow aggregation.
 
*Disease and parasite monitoring
 
 
New actions:
 
 
*Feasibility study for translocation of humpback chub into Upper Havasu Creek (above Beaver Falls).
 
*Evaluate other tributaries for potential translocations.
 
 
== [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker] ==
 
 
Ongoing actions:
 
 
*Larval and small-bodied fish monitoring.
 
 
== Actions to benefit all [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=FISH native aquatic species]  ==
 
 
Ongoing actions:
 
 
*Investigate the possibility of renovating Bright Angel and Shinumo Creeks with a chemical piscicide.
 
*Remove [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Brown_Trout brown trout] (and other [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Nonnative_Invasive_Aquatic_Species nonnative species]) from Bright Angel Creek and the Bright Angel Creek Inflow reach of the Colorado River, and from other areas where new or expanded spawning populations develop.
 
 
New actions:
 
 
*Explore the efficacy of a [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=TEMPERATURE temperature control device] at the dam to respond to potential extremes in hydrological conditions due to climate conditions that could result in [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Nonnative_Invasive_Aquatic_Species nonnative fish] establishment.
 
*Preventing the passage of deleterious invasive nonnative fish through Glen Canyon Dam.
 
*Fund the NPS and GCMRC on the completion of planning and compliance to alter the [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Green_Sunfish_Page backwater slough at River Mile (RM) 12].
 
*Develop a plan for implementing rapid response control efforts for newly establishing or existing deleterious invasive nonnative species.
 
*Experimental use of [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Trout_Management_Flows TMFs] to inhibit [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Brown_Trout brown trout] spawning and recruitment in Glen Canyon
 
 
== Southwestern willow flycatcher and Yuma Ridgway’s rail ==
 
 
*Conduct Yuma Ridgway’s rail surveys
 
*Conduct southwestern willow flycatcher surveys
 
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> LTEMP Experimental and Management Actions [http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Long-term_Experimental_and_Management_Plan_(LTEMP)]  </h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=The_HFE_Page Spring HFEs ≤  45,000 cfs in March or April]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=The_HFE_Page Proactive Spring HFEs ≤ 45,000 cfs in April, May, or June]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=The_HFE_Page Fall HFEs ≤ 45,000 cfs in October or November]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=The_HFE_Page Fall HFEs > 96‐hr duration in October or November]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Trout_Management_Flows Trout management flows from May to August]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=The_Bugflow_Experiment Macroinvertebrate production flows from May to August]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback chub translocations (mainstem and tributaries)]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Humpback_Chub_Page Larval humpback chub head‐start program]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Nonnative_Invasive_Aquatic_Species Mechanical removal of rainbow trout from LCR reach]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Nonnative_Invasive_Aquatic_Species Mechanical removal of invasive fish species]
 
*[http://gcdamp.com/index.php?title=Riparian_Vegetation Riparian vegetation restoration]
 
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Triennial Budget and Work Plan Motions </h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
 
 
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> BAHG meeting notes </h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
 
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#cedff2; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;"> Budget Process Timeline (subject to change)
 
</h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
 
  
  
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 12:41, 21 June 2024


FY21 23 cover.JPG

Triennial Budget and Work Plan -- Fiscal Years 2025-2027

The Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) is an advisory process wherein protection, management, and improvement of Colorado River resources downstream from Glen Canyon Dam are considered in planning dam operations. The Grand Canyon Protection Act (GCPA) of 1992 directs the Secretary of the Interior (the Secretary) to establish and implement long-term monitoring and research programs to ensure that Glen Canyon Dam is operated “… in such a manner as to protect, mitigate adverse impacts to, and improve the values for which Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area were established….”. The 1995 Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Operation of Glen Canyon Dam (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1995) recommended creation of a federal advisory committee to advise the Secretary on adaptive management for operations of the dam. The Record of Decision (ROD) for the 1995 EIS, which was signed in October 1996, created this federal advisory committee. The charter of the Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG) that implements the GCDAMP was signed in January 1997. Many stakeholders who are members of the AMWG also participate at a technical level in the Technical Work Group (TWG). The TWG formulates recommendations about research and monitoring for consideration by the AMWG. A new Long Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) EIS was completed in 2016 and an associated ROD was signed on December 15, 2016 (U.S. Department of the Interior, 2016a, b). The LTEMP ROD reaffirms continuation of the GCDAMP, AMWG and TWG and specifies new experimental flow and non-flow actions and compliance requirements for the operations of Glen Canyon Dam until 2037.



Long-term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP)
The LTEMP provides the basis for decisions that identify management actions and experimental options that will provide a framework for adaptively managing Glen Canyon Dam operations over the next 20 years
LTEMP Science Plan
The LTEMP Science Plan describe a strategy by which monitoring and research data in the natural and social sciences will be collected, analyzed, and provided to DOI, its bureaus, and to the GCDAMP in support of implementation of LTEMP.
Core Monitoring Plan
The GCMRC Core Monitoring Plan (CMP) describes the consistent, long-term, repeated measurements using scientifically accepted protocols to measure status and trends of key resources to answer specific questions. Core monitoring is implemented on a fixed schedule regardless of budget or other circumstances (for example, water year, experimental flows, temperature control, stocking strategy, nonnative control, etc.) affecting target resources.
Monitoring and Research Plan
The GCMRC Monitoring and Research Plan (MRP) specifies (1) core monitoring activities, (2) research and development activities, and (3) long-term experimental activities consistent with the strategies and priorities established in this SSP to be conducted over the next 5 years to address some of the strategic science questions associated with AMWG priority questions.
Budget and Workplan
The GCMRC Triennial Work Plan (TWP) identifies the scope, objectives, and budget for monitoring and research activities planned for a 3-year period. When completed, the triennial work plan will be consistent with the MRP.


FY 2025-2027 Triennial Budget and Work Plan


Links

Triennial Budget and Work Plan Motions


Papers and Presentations


Documents and Direction

Project Summaries for BAHG

Science Advisors TWP Review

Stakeholder Prioritization Survey

BAHG Call Notes

LTEMP Resource Pages

Based on ROD Resource Categories (see page 6 of the ROD)

  • Natural Processes: Not used (is an evaluation of above resources as related to “natural” benchmarks)